Abstract
The article discusses a number of problems related to the interpretation and application of certain types of speech torts. In particular, the author's opinion is given on the interpretation of the concept of "another form that contradicts the norms of morality and ethics", on the differentiation between opinions and statements as parts of publications in Internet blogs. The author expresses the opinion on the necessity of taking into account the context of publication placement when determining the intention of the author of a controversial text, gives examples from personal work experience, and also emphasizes the need of unifying linguistic knowledge to eliminate existing discrepancies in the interpretation of the concepts used. The paper provides examples from the author's personal experience as a forensic linguist.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
