Speculations on the Generation and Movement of Komatiites

Abstract

AbstractThe discovery of komatiites, first in South Africa and then in many other Archean greenstone belts, with MgO concentrations of 20–30% and eruption temperatures of more than ∼1600 °C, showed that some parts of the mantle were hotter in the Archean than they are now. Since their discovery there have been many speculative proposals as to how such magmas can form. At present melt is produced by mantle upwelling, because the solidus temperature gradient of the mantle is steeper than that of isentropic decompression gradient at depths of less than 300 km. In contrast, in the lower half of the upper mantle the solidus gradient is shallower than the isentropic gradient, and, therefore, isentropic upwelling cannot generate melt. At the base of the upper mantle limited melting can occur, either in the thermal boundary layer at the base of the upper mantle, or in the upper part of the lower mantle where the solidus gradient is steeper than the isentropic gradient. In both cases melting can occur at depths of more than 600 km, where Ca perovskite, CaPv, is a stable phase on the solidus. A surprising feature of the partitioning between melt and solid CaPv is that most trace elements are compatible in the solid. Partitioning into CaPv can, therefore, account for the low concentrations of such elements in komatiites. The temperatures required to generate such magmas in plumes need be no more than ∼50 °C above those of Phanerozoic plumes. The presence of komatiites in the Archean, therefore, requires plume temperatures in the first half of the Earth’s history to have been somewhat hotter than they are now, but does not constrain the average temperature of the Archean upper mantle.