Abstract
Many experimental data suggest that a listener who focuses attention on a specific spectral region (or regions) becomes more sensitive to sounds falling there than elsewhere. Most often, the subject's task has been to detect a pure tone in noise. For example, in a two-interval, forced-choice paradigm, scores were around 90% when the signal was at an expected target frequency (0.5, 1, 2, or 4kHz) and were near chance, 50%, when the signal was at an unexpected frequency more than a half critical band away. In other tests, subjects detected unexpected temporal patterns (repeated tone bursts) just as well as expected patterns, provided spectral frequencies were the same. It has also been shown that when listening to a sequence of tone bursts that rise (or fall) in frequency, subjects miss a burst at a frequency significantly different from the value it normally has in the sequence. Other data suggest similar spectral specificity in the discriminationof complex sounds, including speech. Just what mechanism improves performance remains unclear. Nevertheless, some measurements of evoked physiological responses leave open the possibility that spectral specificity is achieved by efferent input to the auditory periphery, perhaps even to the cochlea.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.