Abstract
Although the US has relied on the ICJ’s doctrine of specially-affected states to claim that powerful states in the Global North play a privileged role in the formation of customary international law, the doctrine itself has been almost completely ignored both by the ICJ and by legal scholars. This article attempts to fill that lacuna. In particular, by focusing on debates in a variety of areas of international law -- from the law of the sea to the jus ad bellum -- it addresses two questions: (1) what makes a state “specially affected”? and (2) what exactly is the importance of a state qualifying as “specially affected” for the formation of custom? The article concludes not only that the US approach to the doctrine of specially-affected states is flawed, but also that a more theoretically coherent understanding of the doctrine would give states in the Global South significant power over custom formation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
