Abstract

Literature on driving research suggests a relationship between cognition and driving performance in older and younger drivers. There is little research on adults and driving, despite them being the largest age cohort behind the wheel. Among the cognitive domains, visuospatial abilities are expected to be highly predictive of driving skills and driving fitness. The relationship between specific spatial mental transformation skills (i.e., object and self-based ones) and driving performance has not yet been examined. The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between overall cognitive functioning, self and object-based spatial mental transformation skills, and driving performance in a sample of younger and older adult drivers. Participants were comprised of one hundred younger and 83 older adult Italian drivers. Participants completed a computerized driving test assessing traffic stress resilience, visual and motor reaction time, and the ability to obtain an overview of the traffic scenario (DT, vRT, mRT, and ATAV respectively in the Shufried®-Vienna Test System–DRIVESC). The Mental Rotation Test (MRT) and the Object Perspective Taking Test (OPT) were administered in order to assess object-based and self-based spatial mental transformation skills. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Test (MoCA) was administered control for global cognitive functioning. The effects of education and gender were also controlled in the analysis. The results of the present study suggested that: (1) The effect of age, favoring younger participants, was found in DT, vRT, mRT, and ATAVT tests. (2) The effect of global cognitive functioning was found in DT and ATAV tests. (3) The effect of the spatial mental transformation tests was found in DT, vRT (MRT only), and ATAVT (OPT only) tests. Taken together, these results suggest the specific contribution of spatial mental transformation skills in the execution of complex behaviors connected to the fitness to drive. Prospectively, the results of the present study relating spatial mental transformation skills and driving processes may be a valuable source of knowledge for researchers dealing with the relationship between cognitive resources and navigation aids.

Highlights

  • Driving a motor vehicle is one of the most complex, multifaceted, and potentially hazardous tasks that people encounter every day (Michon, 1979; Lee, 2008; Ledger et al, 2019a)

  • No significant differences were found in the DRIVESC subtests performance among the different classes of time of driving [Determination Test (DT): F(2, 180) = 1.21, p = 0.30; Reaction Times (RTM): F(2, 180) = 0.61, p = 0.54; RTV: F(2, 180) = 1.02, p = 0.36; ATAVT: F(2, 180) = 0.17, p = 0.84]

  • Males performed significantly better than females in Mental Rotation Test (MRT) [t(181) = −3.80, p < 0.001] and Object Perspective Taking Test (OPT) [t(181) = 2.40, p < 0.05] and showed lower reaction times [RTM: t(181) = −6.77, p < 0.001; RTV: t(181) = −2.64, p < 0.005]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Driving a motor vehicle is one of the most complex, multifaceted, and potentially hazardous tasks that people encounter every day (Michon, 1979; Lee, 2008; Ledger et al, 2019a). It requires the processing of simultaneous environmental cues and the simultaneous execution of several sub-tasks in a safe way (Galski et al, 1992). Driving skills and driving style correspond to what Evans (1991) initially theorized as “driving performance” and “driving behavior,” respectively Both measures are considered intrinsic to driving (Elander et al, 1993). Cognitive abilities (i.e., reaction times, visual attention) and personality traits (i.e., type A personality, sensation seeking) would count among a driver’s extrinsic measures

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.