Abstract
The transmission of ultraviolet (UVR) and photosynthetically available radiation (PAR) through sea ice is a key factor controlling under-ice phytoplankton growth in seasonally ice-covered waters. The increase towards sufficient light levels for positive net photosynthesis occurs concurrently with the sea ice melt progression in late spring when ice surface conditions shift from a relatively homogeneous high-albedo snow cover to a less reflective mosaic of bare ice and melt ponds. Here, we present a detailed dataset on the spatial and temporal progression of transmitted UVR and PAR in relation to changing quantities of snow, sea ice and melt ponds. Data were collected with a remotely operated vehicle (ROV) during the GreenEdge landfast sea ice campaign in June-July 2016 in southwestern Baffin Bay. Over the course of melt progression, there was a 10-fold increase in spatially averaged UVR and PAR transmission through the sea ice cover, reaching a maximum transmission of 31% for PAR, 7% for UVB and 26% for UVA radiation. The depth under the sea ice experiencing spatial variability in light levels due to the influence of surface heterogeneity in snow, white ice and melt pond distributions increased from 7 +/- 4 to 20 +/- 6 m over our study. Phytoplankton drifting in under-ice surface waters were thus exposed to variations in PAR availability of up to 43%, highlighting the importance to account for spatial heterogeneity in light transmission through melting sea ice. Consequently, we demonstrate that spatial averages of PAR transmission provided more representative light availability estimates to explain under-ice bloom progression relative to single point irradiance measurements during the sea ice melt season. Encouragingly, the strong dichotomy between white ice and melt pond PAR transmittance and surface albedo permitted a very good estimate of spatially averaged light transmission from drone imagery of the surface and point transmittance measurements beneath different ice surface types.
Highlights
In the Arctic Ocean, under-ice phytoplankton blooms can contribute significantly to spring primary production and have been documented more frequently in the last decades (e.g., Fortier et al, 2002; Mundy et al, 2009; Arrigo et al, 2014; Assmy et al, 2017; Oziel et al, 2019)
Understanding the magnitude of sunlight transmitted through the melting sea ice is of key importance to improve our understanding of the spring phytoplankton bloom
Our objectives were achieved through combined measurements of horizontal transects
Summary
In the Arctic Ocean, under-ice phytoplankton blooms can contribute significantly to spring primary production and have been documented more frequently in the last decades (e.g., Fortier et al, 2002; Mundy et al, 2009; Arrigo et al, 2014; Assmy et al, 2017; Oziel et al, 2019). The intensified differences in light transmittance through ponded vs white ice combined with the lateral spreading of radiation within the ice layer create a more complex underwater light field (Frey et al, 2011; Katlein et al, 2016; Massicotte et al, 2018; Matthes et al, 2019) As shown in these studies studying the under-ice light field, vertical radiation transfer can be influenced by higher light transmittance through more transparent near-by structures causing edge effects at the ice bottom and subsurface irradiance maxima. Thought from a surface perspective, Perovich (2005)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
