Sparse Bayesian learning for label efficiency in cardiac real-time MRI

One of the most significant developments of the last decade in ultrasound imaging of the heart was the evolution of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging from slow and labor-intense offline reconstruction to real-time volumetric imaging. This imaging modality provides valuable clinical information that empowers echocardiographers with new levels of confidence in the diagnosis of heart disease. We have previously described the technological milestones in the development of real-time 3D echocardiographic (RT3DE) imaging and its major advantages over conventional 2-dimensional echocardiography (2DE) and reviewed the published literature that supported the use of this new methodology in clinical practice.1 Since 2006, the growing availability of RT3DE technology, its ease of use, and its multiple attractive features have sparked significant interest in the research community, resulting in a large number of publications, most of which have endorsed RT3DE imaging for clinical use by demonstrating its unique capabilities in different scenarios. In parallel, the clinical acceptance of this new tool has broadened significantly. The most recent clinically significant addition is matrix-array transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), which provides images of unprecedented quality that aid surgeons and interventional cardiologists in planning and guiding procedures and evaluating their outcomes. The purpose of the present article is to review the most recent RT3DE literature and provide readers with an update on the latest developments and the current status of this noninvasive imaging tool. Because different potential applications of RT3DE imaging have been explored to various extents, they are described here separately, and each is discussed with an emphasis on the scientifically established facts, along with the known stumbling blocks and difficulties. A firmly established advantage of 3D imaging over cross-sectional slices of the heart is the improvement in the accuracy of the evaluation of left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction (EF) by eliminating the need for geometric modeling, which …

Comprehensive Assessment of Right Ventricular Function by Three-Dimensional Speckle-Tracking Echocardiography: Comparisons with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Major advances in the field of pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery over the last several decades have led to a dramatic improvement in survival rates for most forms of congenital heart disease (CHD). For example, hypoplastic left heart syndrome, a previously lethal defect, now has early survival rates up to 90% at major centers.1 These improved outcomes have produced a growing population of survivors with complex CHD who are now reaching adulthood (Figure 1). During this period, improvements in surgical and medical treatments have been accompanied by developments in diagnostic modalities. Echocardiography has replaced catheterization as the primary diagnostic modality, and it is now uncommon for newborn infants to undergo catheterization for purely diagnostic purposes. Although echocardiography remains the bedrock of noninvasive cardiac imaging, the array of diagnostic modalities and techniques available continue to grow and this has spawned the specialty of “noninvasive cardiac imaging” and the need for the “cardiac imager” to be adept in all the different modalities. Figure 1. Percentage of patients under the age of 1 year (grey bars) and over the age of 18 years (black bars) undergoing echocardiography at Children’s Hospital Boston from 1983 through 2006. Note the reverse trends of these age groups reflecting the steady increase in the proportion of adult patients with congenital heart disease. Although the absolute number of infants undergoing echocardiography during this time period has increased, their proportion has steadily declined. Echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and cardiac computed tomography (CCT) are the primary modalities used for noninvasive cardiac imaging in patients with CHD. Nuclear scintigraphy is used in selected circumstances. The Table summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of each modality. Figure 2 shows temporal trends in utilization for the various noninvasive cardiac imaging techniques at our center. It is clear that echocardiography is the most frequently …

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has evolved over the last decade into an indispensable diagnostic instrument. CMR imaging noninvasively provides structural, functional and morphological information with high spatial resolution and an unlimited field of view. Since October 2006 the VieCuri Medical Centre in Venlo has a CMR scanner at its disposal. The goal of this study was to analyse the impact of CMR imaging on diagnosis and treatment in daily practice in the setting of a medium-volume peripheral hospital. All patients who underwent CMR imaging between October 2006 and November 2008 were included in this analysis. The medical history before and after the CMR scan, the application form for CMR imaging and the outcome of the scans were reviewed. CMR images, obtained using a 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging system, were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team. In 235 patients CMR imaging demonstrated one or more abnormalities, whereas CMR imaging did not identify any abnormalities in 148 patients. CMR imaging confirmed an expected finding in 166 cases, identified an unexpected condition in 69 cases, ruled out an expected finding in 59 cases and ruled out a suspected condition in 89 cases. Due to better insight into diagnosis, CMR imaging resulted in a change of treatment in 166 of the total of 383 CMR scans (43%). In a relevant number of cases CMR imaging leads to a change in the treatment of a patient, proving the value of CMR imaging as a diagnostic modality. Therefore, CMR imaging is an excellent opportunity for peripheral medical centres to improve efficiency and the standard of patient care. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:524-30.).

To prospectively compare 64-section multidetector computed tomography (CT) and cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for the early assessment of myocardial enhancement and infarct size after acute reperfused myocardial infarction (MI). The study was HIPAA compliant and was approved by the institutional review board. All participants gave written informed consent. Twenty-one patients (18 men; mean age, 60 years +/- 13 [standard deviation]) were examined with 64-section multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging 5 days or fewer after a first reperfused MI. Multidetector CT was performed during the first pass of contrast material to assess myocardial perfusion and detect microvascular obstruction (no reflow). In 15 patients, a second scan was performed 7 minutes later to assess total infarct size by using delayed hyperenhancement. Early hypoenhancement and delayed hyperenhancement were compared between multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging with Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Early hypoenhancement was recognized on all multidetector CT and cardiac MR images. Delayed hyperenhancement was observed with cardiac MR imaging at all examinations and with multidetector CT at 11 of 15 examinations. While signal intensity differences between hypoperfused and normal myocardium were comparable for first-pass multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging, cardiac MR imaging had a far better contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for delayed acquisitions than did CT (P < .001). Hypoenhanced areas (as a percentage of left ventricular mass) at first-pass multidetector CT (11% +/- 6) correlated well with those at first-pass cardiac MR imaging (7% +/- 4, R(2) = 0.72). Delayed-enhancement multidetector CT (13% +/- 9) correlated well with delayed-enhancement cardiac MR imaging (15% +/- 7, R(2) = 0.55). Quantification of delayed hypoenhancement (n = 12) had very good correlation between multidetector CT (4% +/- 4) and cardiac MR imaging (3% +/- 2) (R(2) = 0.85). Early and late hypoenhancement showed good CNR and correlated well between multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging.

Cardiac MRI Assessment of Left and Right Ventricular Parameters in Healthy Australian Normal Volunteers

Echocardiographic Assessment of Right Ventricular Volumes after Surgical Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot: Clinical Validation of a New Echocardiographic Method

BackgroundRight ventricular (RV) volume and function are important diagnostic and prognostic factors in dogs with primary or secondary right-sided heart failure. The complex shape of the right ventricle and its retrosternal position make the quantification of its volume difficult. For that reason, only few studies exist, which deal with the determination of RV volume parameters. In human medicine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) is considered to be the reference technique for RV volumetric measurement (Nat Rev Cardiol 7(10):551-563, 2010), but cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) are other non-invasive methods feasible for RV volume quantification. The purpose of this study was the comparison of 3DE and CCT with CMRI, the gold standard for RV volumetric quantification.Results3DE showed significant lower and CCT significant higher right ventricular volumes than CMRI. Both techniques showed very good correlations (R > 0.8) with CMRI for the volumetric parameters end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV). Ejection fraction (EF) and stroke volume (SV) were not different when considering CCT and CMRI, whereas 3DE showed a significant higher EF and lower SV than CMRI. The 3DE values showed excellent intra-observer variability (<3%) and still acceptable inter-observer variability (<13%).ConclusionCCT provides an accurate image quality of the right ventricle with comparable results to the reference method CMRI. CCT overestimates the RV volumes; therefore, it is not an interchangeable method, having the disadvantage as well of needing general anaesthesia. 3DE underestimated the RV-Volumes, which could be explained by the worse image resolution. The excellent correlation between the methods indicates a close relationship between 3DE and CMRI although not directly comparable. 3DE is a promising technique for RV volumetric quantification, but further studies in awake dogs and dogs with heart disease are necessary to evaluate its usefulness in veterinary cardiology.

A previously healthy 39-year-old man was admitted to our department with biventricular cardiac decompensation (New York Heart Association class IV) and acute onset of angina pectoris after a flulike disease 1 week earlier. The ECG on admission displayed ST elevations in II, III, and aVF. Troponin T on admission was increased (2.20 mg/L, normal value<0.03 mg/L), with increased creatine phosphokinase (503 U/L; normal value<171 U/L) and creatine phosphokinase myocardial band (45 U/L; normal value=10 U/L). N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide was highly elevated (15,848 pg/mL; normal value<125 pg/mL). Coronary artery disease was excluded by coronary angiography. Multiple nonsustained ventricular tachycardias were recorded by Holter monitoring and telemetry. Endomyocardial biopsies obtained from the right ventricular septum demonstrated active myocarditis by histological investigations according to the Dallas criteria (Figure 1A). By immunohistological staining of endomyocardial biopsies1 and quantification using digital image analysis, highly increased focal lymphocytic (CD3+: 267.4/mm2, CD11a/LFA-1+: 498.9/mm2; Figure 1B) and macrophage infiltrates (CD11b/Mac-1+: 481.6/mm2), sarcolemmal human leukocyte antigen class I expression (area fraction of human leukocyte antigen class I=35.6%; Figure 1C), and focal abundance …

ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy and potential bias of computed tomography (CT) ventricular volumetry using semiautomatic three-dimensional (3D) threshold-based segmentation in repaired tetralogy of Fallot, and to compare them to those of two-dimensional (2D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated 32 patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot who had undergone both cardiac CT and MRI within 3 years. For ventricular volumetry, semiautomatic 3D threshold-based segmentation was used in CT, while a manual simplified contouring 2D method was used in MRI. The indexed ventricular volumes were compared between CT and MRI. The indexed ventricular stroke volumes were compared with the indexed arterial stroke volumes measured using phase-contrast MRI. The mean differences and degrees of agreement in the indexed ventricular and stroke volumes were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsThe indexed end-systolic (ES) volumes showed no significant difference between CT and MRI (p > 0.05), while the indexed end-diastolic (ED) volumes were significantly larger on CT than on MRI (93.6 ± 17.5 mL/m2 vs. 87.3 ± 15.5 mL/m2 for the left ventricle [p < 0.001] and 177.2 ± 39.5 mL/m2 vs. 161.7 ± 33.1 mL/m2 for the right ventricle [p < 0.001], respectively). The mean differences between CT and MRI were smaller for the indexed ES volumes (2.0–2.5 mL/m2) than for the indexed ED volumes (6.3–15.5 mL/m2). CT overestimated the stroke volumes by 14–16%. With phase-contrast MRI as a reference, CT (7.2–14.3 mL/m2) showed greater mean differences in the indexed stroke volumes than did MRI (0.8–3.3 mL/m2; p < 0.005).ConclusionCompared to 2D MRI, CT ventricular volumetry using semiautomatic 3D threshold-based segmentation provides comparable ES volumes, but overestimates the ED and stroke volumes in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.

To develop a cardiac computed tomographic (CT) method with which to determine extracellular volume (ECV) fraction, with cardiac magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as the reference standard. Study participants provided written informed consent to participate in this institutional review board-approved study. ECV was measured in healthy subjects and patients with heart failure by using cardiac CT and cardiac MR imaging. Paired Student t test, linear regression analysis, and Pearson correlation analysis were used to determine the relationship between cardiac CT and MR imaging ECV values and clinical parameters. Twenty-four subjects were studied. There was good correlation between myocardial ECV measured at cardiac MR imaging and that measured at cardiac CT (r = 0.82, P < .001). As expected, ECV was higher in patients with heart failure than in healthy control subjects for both cardiac CT and cardiac MR imaging (P = .03, respectively). For both cardiac MR imaging and cardiac CT, ECV was positively associated with end diastolic and end systolic volume and inversely related to ejection fraction (P < .05 for all). Mean radiation dose was 1.98 mSv ± 0.16 (standard deviation) for each cardiac CT acquisition. ECV at cardiac CT and that at cardiac MR imaging showed good correlation, suggesting the potential for myocardial tissue characterization with cardiac CT.

Comparison of Left and Right Atrial Volume by Echocardiography Versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using the Area-Length Method

Real-Time Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A New Spin on the Evaluation of HFpEF.

Echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction (EF) is widely used in the pediatric population. However, there is no consensus on the most accurate method of quantifying ventricular volumes and systolic function. The purpose of this study is to compare two commonly used echocardiographic methods for the evaluation of LV volume and quantification of EF, the five-sixth area-length (5/6 AL) and the modified biplane Simpson (BS), to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in children. CMR studies were paired with echocardiograms and retrospectively analyzed in children 18 years of age and younger. Studies performed more than 3 months between modalities, patients with congenital heart disease, and patients who had changes in medication regimen between corresponding CMR and echocardiograms were excluded. LV volumes and EF were calculated using the 5/6 AL and BS methods and compared to volumes and EF measured on corresponding CMR studies. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on LV function, pathology, and weight. We retrospectively analyzed 53 CMR and corresponding echocardiogram studies (23 studies for myocarditis and 30 studies for cardiomyopathy) in 46 patients. LVEF derived by both echocardiographic methods showed a good correlation to CMR (5/6 AL r = 0.85 and BS r = 0.82). However, both echocardiographic methods overestimated LVEF and underestimated LV volumes when compared to CMR. Left ventricular volumes and EF, as measured by echocardiography, correlate well with CMR measurements. Echocardiography underestimates LV systolic and diastolic volumes and overestimates LVEF. While echocardiography is a good surrogate for estimating LVEF, CMR should be considered in patients for whom accurate measurements are needed for critical clinical decision-making.

Cardiac Involvement in Athletes Recovering From COVID-19: A Reason for Hope.