Abstract

and remote. (Op. cit., p. 43) How logical form thus understood could be a form of union between Socrates and hemlock?not, please note, between thoughts of or terms for Socrates and hemlock?certainly is a mat ter which would place great demands on one's categorial scheme, to say the least. And, from another point of view, how logical form thus understood simultaneously enters into thinking and talking about Socrates and hemlock, to the validity of which it is especially relevant, seems to defy any known ontological pattern. This content downloaded from 157.55.39.212 on Thu, 09 Jun 2016 05:17:16 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.