Abstract

Abstract Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and costs associated with a dedicated flexible cystoscope for the removal of ureteric stents from transplant recipients in the outpatient setting. Methods In our centre, we routinely performed post renal transplant ureteric stent removal in theatres. Recently we have switched this practice to outpatient settings. We performed retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from two settings between Aug 2018-Dec 2021 to compare the impact on the timing of post renal transplant ureteric stent removal, associated complications, cost effectiveness and patient satisfaction. Results In total 99 ureteric stents were removed from 100 transplant recipients in theatre and 100 stents in outpatient department. 2 patients in clinic cohort did not tolerate procedure under LA. 5 patients in theatre cohort and 6 patients in clinic cohort underwent PD catheter removal in theatres along with stent removal. Earlier stent removal was achieved in clinic compared with theatre with (36 versus 55 days after transplant; p=0.001) There was no statistically significant difference in infection rates following stent removal in either groups. Outpatient stent removal proved to be very cost effective to the trust with savings of over £250 per procedure in comparison to the theatre setting. Patient satisfaction was measured by numerical rating score for pain and discomfort which showed that the patients tolerated the outpatient procedure under local anaesthesia very well,(mean score 4/10). Conclusions A dedicated outpatient ureteric stent removal service for kidney transplant recipients seems to be feasible, cost effective, and safe.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.