Sovereignty, Integration or Bifurcation? Troubled Histories, Contentious Territories and the Political Horizons of the Long Lingering Naga Movement

Abstract

Taking the upland, tribal Nagas, and the long lingering Indo-Naga conflict, as my case, this article positions divergent contemporary political and territorial claims and counterclaims in the historical longue durée. While the initial assertion for a sovereign, independent Nagalim envisaged a political and administrative reordering of a region cut across by the colonial Indo-Burma border, over time the Naga national movement increasingly conformed to this international boundary—at least in praxis—as political attention shifted towards the integration of Naga lands within India but presently divided across multiple states. More recently, another territorial quandary emerged as the Eastern Naga People’s Organization articulated a demand for the bifurcation of present-day Nagaland, as it was enacted in 1963, through the creation of a new state to be called ‘Frontier Nagaland’. If amidst ongoing strife and uncertainty, these divergent political and territorial aspirations suggest a sinking ever more deeply into a morass of conflicting aspirations, oppositional sentiments and political disorder, this article attempts to historically situate each of these claims, as well as discusses some of their implications, inner intricacies and indeterminacies, in the upshot serving a heady cocktail of colonial legacies, borders that divide, and post-colonial political imaginations, spiked with shots of old tribal antagonisms and new alignments.