Abstract

Simple SummaryMany cancers down-regulate the expression of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) to avoid recognition and elimination by the adaptive immune system. Natural Killer (NK) cells, as part of innate immunity, complement tumor recognition by their ability to sense foreign and malignant cells by the lack of major MHC-I expression. During development, NK cells learn to perceive physiological levels of self MHC-I as healthy in a process termed NK cell education. In the current study, we assessed whether the stimulation of natural killer T (NKT) cells could impact the tumor-killing ability of NK cells. We can show that stimulation with a well-established activator of NKT cells induces the preferential expansion of educated NK cells, and improves NK-cell-mediated tumor-killing of both MHC-I+ and MHC-I− tumor cells. Furthermore, this increased tumor-killing capacity of NK cells can be achieved by nanovesicle-mediated delivery, which is known to improve adaptive immunity as well. Our approach thus holds great potential for future cancer immunotherapy.Natural killer (NK) cells can kill target cells via the recognition of stress molecules and down-regulation of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I). Some NK cells are educated to recognize and kill cells that have lost their MHC-I expression, e.g., tumor or virus-infected cells. A desired property of cancer immunotherapy is, therefore, to activate educated NK cells during anti-tumor responses in vivo. We here analyze NK cell responses to α-galactosylceramide (αGC), a potent activator of invariant NKT (iNKT) cells, or to exosomes loaded with αGC. In mouse strains which express different MHC-I alleles using an extended NK cell flow cytometry panel, we show that αGC induces a biased NK cell proliferation of educated NK cells. Importantly, iNKT cell-induced activation of NK cells selectively increased in vivo missing self-responses, leading to more effective rejection of tumor cells. Exosomes from antigen-presenting cells are attractive anti-cancer therapy tools as they may induce both innate and adaptive immune responses, thereby addressing the hurdle of tumor heterogeneity. Adding αGC to antigen-loaded dendritic-cell-derived exosomes also led to an increase in missing self-responses in addition to boosted T and B cell responses. This study manifests αGC as an attractive adjuvant in cancer immunotherapy, as it increases the functional capacity of educated NK cells and enhances the innate, missing self-based antitumor response.

Highlights

  • Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic effector cells with important functions in antitumor immunity

  • OVA) [47]. (A) Activation by CD69 and (B) KLRG1 expression was measured by flow cytometry on d7. (C,D) Mice were (A) Activation by CD69 and (B) KLRG1 expression was measured by flow cytometry on d7. (C,D) Mice were treated with treated with PBS, 0.4, 4 or 40 μg exo(αGC-OVA) or with 200 ng soluble αGC and fed with BrdU in drinking water for 7 days. (C) Proliferation was assessed by measuring BrdU incorporation at day 7 on total NK cells. (D) NK cells were stained for inhibitory receptors (Ly49C/Ly49I/NKG2A/Ly49A/Ly49G2) and the proliferation index was assessed as described in Materials and Methods

  • The current study shows that stimulation of invariant NKT (iNKT) cells with exosome-bound or soluble αGC, a natural CD1d ligand, leads to an increased functional capacity and preferential proliferation of educated NK

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Natural killer (NK) cells are cytotoxic effector cells with important functions in antitumor immunity These cells were initially characterized for their natural ability to lyse tumor cells lacking major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) [1,2]. NK cells that express inhibitory receptors and are able to bind self-MHC-I alleles acquire the ability to recognize target cells that have lost the particular MHC-I allele. This gain in functional capacity, e.g., killing of target cells or IFNγ secretion, is termed NK cell education [4,5,6,7,8], while the process of killing

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.