Abstract
<b>Objective: </b>Reports of amputations associated with sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors have been inconsistent. We aimed to compare the risk of below-knee amputation with SGLT2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors among patients with type 2 diabetes. <p><b>Research Design and Methods:</b> This is a multicenter observational study using administrative healthcare databases from 7 Canadian provinces and the United Kingdom. Incident SGLT2 inhibitor users were matched to DPP-4 inhibitor users using a prevalent new user design and time-conditional propensity scores. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate site-specific adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) of incident below-knee amputation for SGLT2 inhibitor versus DPP-4 inhibitor users. Random effects meta-analyses were used to pool the site-specific results.</p> <p><b>Results:</b> The study cohort included 207,817 incident SGLT2 inhibitor users matched to 207,817 DPP-4 inhibitor users. During a mean exposed follow up time of 11 months, the amputation rate among SGLT2 inhibitor users was 1.3 per 1,000 person-years and 1.5 per 1,000 person-years among DPP-4 inhibitor users. The adjusted HR of below-knee amputations associated with SGLT2 inhibitor use compared to DPP-4 inhibitor use was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.71-1.09). Similar results were obtained in stratified analyses by specific SGLT2 inhibitor molecule.</p> <p><b>Conclusions: </b>In this large multicenter observational study, there was no association between SGLT2 inhibitor use and incident below-knee amputations among patients with type 2 diabetes, compared to DPP-4 inhibitor use. While these findings provide some reassurance, studies with longer duration of follow-up are needed to assess potential long-term effects.</p>
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.