Abstract

The main objective of the study was to assess the current knowledge and perceptions of the communities on the ecosystem services provided by the water tanks with special reference to a tank cascade system in Anuradhapura District. The findings were used to get an understanding of the present status of management, gaps and provide recommendations using an integrated approach with the relevant stakeholders. An ancient tank cascade system situated in the Kahatagasdigiliya Divisional Secretariat Division in Anuradhapura District of the North Central Province was used for the study. Four tanks constituted the selected cascade system, namely Bambarahela wewa, Kumbuk wewa, Diwul wewa and Hettu wewa and were located in three villages ie. Bambarahela, Diwulwewa and Hettuwewa. The former villages were inhabited by Sinhala Buddhist while the latter was by Muslims. These tanks are under the jurisdiction of the Konwewa Agrarian Development Office. Secondary data as well as primary data were collected on the socio economic, ecological and managerial environment of the tank cascade and related areas. Primary data were gathered using structured questionnaires, key informant interviews. Mixed methods were used to analyse data. According to the findings, majority of the village communities use the tank for farming and related activities, bathing and washing etc. However, none use the tank water for drinking as they have a notion that it is polluted. A statistically significant relationship (p<0.05) was not observed between the occupation and monthly income of the communities with their knowledge of the ecosystem services of the tanks while the education level of households showed a positive relationship (p<0.05). However, there was a lack of knowledge on the full range of ecosystem services of the tanks, tank cascades and this needed to be enhanced. All the respondents were of the view that the tank and associated environment need to be improved and while they were somewhat satisfied with the activities of the farmer organisations and the officials of the Department of Agrarian Services they agreed that this needed improvement to procure the full potential of the tank cascade system. All the respondents were willing to contribute to the improvement and conservation of the tanks. The majority (61%) agreed to pay a fee ranging from a minimum of Rs. 100 to above Rs. 200) annually for tank management. Therefore it could be recommended that in order to promote the ecosystem approach in tank management it is required to enhance the knowledge among the stakeholders and follow an inclusive and integrated approach with the participation of especially farmers and farmer organizations and the officials of the Department of Agrarian Services.

Highlights

  • Water tanks are not merely structures built to store water but complex man-made ecosystems involving many natural resources and providing a wide variety of functions and services

  • The central presence of the tank gives the essential structure to the territory as seen clearly in the tank cascade systems (TCS) abundant in the North Central Province of the country

  • Majority were aware of the function of the tank in the water conservation and use and the contribution of the tank cascade system in the water purification

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water tanks are not merely structures built to store water but complex man-made ecosystems involving many natural resources and providing a wide variety of functions and services. Different stakeholders actively make use of the resources and functions of a tank ecosystem. The different ecological, social, and economic elements involved in the ecosystem are closely related and dependent on the existence of the water tank. Some groups influence only the ecosystem transformation without being directly involved in the management (Ariza et al, 2007) It seems to be a common perception among tank users, and other stakeholders, that poor maintenance is a reason for insufficient water availability. Similar studies show that farmers were willing to pay for operation and maintenance costs This suggests that revenue sources from tanks can be developed, that the obstacle for sufficient funding is not because of farmers’ willingness to pay. Some had stopped paying the fees because of dissatisfactions with the Farmers’ Associations (Nehlin, 2016)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.