Abstract

Previous studies have shown that people with conservative social attitudes tend to make less use of principled moral arguments. Emler (1983; Morality in the making. Chichester: Wiley) has argued that this is a matter of choice, or political ideology, rather than cognitive deficiency, since people with conservative attitudes do selectively endorse principled moral arguments when asked to role-play someone with liberal social attitudes. Following Thornton and Thornton's (1983; Morality in the making. Chichester: Wiley) identification of methodological difficulties with Emler's role-playing task, the present study investigated the same issue using a rather more direct measure of the ability to understand principled moral ideas. Results indicate that people who fail to understand principled moral ideas tend to hold unusually conservative social attitudes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.