Abstract

Abstract. The Snow Ensemble Uncertainty Project (SEUP) is an effort to establish a baseline characterization of snow water equivalent (SWE) uncertainty across North America with the goal of informing global snow observational needs. An ensemble-based modeling approach, encompassing a suite of current operational models is used to assess the uncertainty in SWE and total snow storage (SWS) estimation over North America during the 2009–2017 period. The highest modeled SWE uncertainty is observed in mountainous regions, likely due to the relatively deep snow, forcing uncertainties, and variability between the different models in resolving the snow processes over complex terrain. This highlights a need for high-resolution observations in mountains to capture the high spatial SWE variability. The greatest SWS is found in Tundra regions where, even though the spatiotemporal variability in modeled SWE is low, there is considerable uncertainty in the SWS estimates due to the large areal extent over which those estimates are spread. This highlights the need for high accuracy in snow estimations across the Tundra. In midlatitude boreal forests, large uncertainties in both SWE and SWS indicate that vegetation–snow impacts are a critical area where focused improvements to modeled snow estimation efforts need to be made. Finally, the SEUP results indicate that SWE uncertainty is driving runoff uncertainty, and measurements may be beneficial in reducing uncertainty in SWE and runoff, during the melt season at high latitudes (e.g., Tundra and Taiga regions) and in the western mountain regions, whereas observations at (or near) peak SWE accumulation are more helpful over the midlatitudes.

Highlights

  • Seasonal snow plays an important role in Earth’s climate and ecological systems and influences the number of water resources available for agriculture, hydropower, and human consumption, serving as the primary freshwater supply for more than a billion people worldwide (Foster et al, 2011)

  • The reference datasets used for evaluation in Snow Ensemble Uncertainty Project (SEUP) are (1) the daily, gridded snow depth, and snow water equivalent (SWE) analysis from the NOAA National Weather Service’s National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center (NOHRSC) Snow Data Assimilation System (SNODAS; Barrett, 2003) available at 30 arcsec spatial resolution; (2) daily gridded estimates of snow depth and SWE developed by the University of Arizona (UA; Zeng et al, 2018) available at 4 km spatial resolution; and (3) the daily, gridded snow depth analysis from the Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC; Brown and Brasnett, 2010) available at 25 km spatial resolution

  • The study quantifies how uncertainty in SWE varies with key land surface characteristics such as topography, vegetation, and snow climate and evaluates the spatiotemporal influence of significant SWE uncertainty on runoff estimation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Seasonal snow plays an important role in Earth’s climate and ecological systems and influences the number of water resources available for agriculture, hydropower, and human consumption, serving as the primary freshwater supply for more than a billion people worldwide (Foster et al, 2011). Developing the necessary observational methods for global coverage while supporting local snow applications is a significant challenge facing the snow community (Dozier et al, 2016; Lettenmaier et al, 2015) Both models and remote sensing techniques are impacted by numerous factors, resulting in significant spatial or temporal errors in SWE estimation. The SEUP ensemble establishes an important baseline over the continental scales to characterize current capabilities and inform global snow observational requirements Toward this goal, in this article we strive to address several gaps in our current understanding of SWE uncertainty with our simulation of snow states over the North American continental domain, including the following questions.

Study area and time period
Forcing datasets
SEUP ensemble evaluation methods
Reference and ancillary datasets used in the uncertainty evaluation
Results and discussion
Evaluation of the SEUP ensemble
Spatial variability of SWE
Timing of annual peak SWE
Interannual variability of SWE
Impact between different LSMs and forcing data on SWE uncertainty
Observational needs
Uncertainty analysis on different topography
Uncertainty analysis stratified by snow classes
Influence of vegetation on SWE uncertainty
Uncertainties in the runoff estimation
Summary and conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.