Abstract
A comparative reading of The Wealth of Nations and of The Theory of Moral Sentiments has made it possible to identify the characteristics of Smith's 'undertaker', and to reveal the irreconcilable nature of these with those that Bentham ascribed to 'projectors'. In particular, Smith developed a multi-functional theory of entrepreneurship, although his analysis essentially focused on the undertaker as risk-bearer. By contrast, Bentham developed a mono-functional theory, one based on the revolutionary concept of the 'innovator' or 'creative entrepreneur'. And it also transpires that he anticipated - sometimes in an extremely surprising fashion - many of the components of Schumpeter's analysis of the subject. (This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
