Abstract
Subject African Sovereign Wealth Funds Significance Sub-Saharan African (SSA) sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) are yet to live up to the promise of transforming the structure of resource-rich countries by creating significant inter-generational assets such as improved infrastructure. On the one hand, political constraints in most establishing countries have limited capitalisation of funds. On the other, low returns on investments only provide marginal revenue diversification benefits. As a result, SWFs have largely failed as a mechanism for insulating minerals exporters from lower commodity prices. Impacts With just 10% of SWF assets allocated to infrastructure, their chances of engineering a Botswana-style economic transformation are remote. Measures of overall institutional development will remain better predictors of the likely success of SWFs than fund-specific ones. A concentration of SWFs' investments in hotels and real estate will perpetuate a preference for consumption over intergenerational equity.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
