Abstract

AbstractIn Canada, boreal caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) are declining in numbers, in part due to increased predation by wolves (Canis lupus). One management option to reduce wolf–caribou interactions and thus protect caribou is to remove man‐made linear features (LFs), structures such as roads, trails, and cut lines, which are used by wolves as traveling paths. Linear features increase wolf traveling speed and could additionally facilitate wolf entry into caribou habitat. Our goal was to quantify the expected effect of LF removal on caribou mortality and investigate whether this LF restoration could be a sufficient measure to stop caribou declines. We simulated the effects of LF restoration on caribou adult and calf survival in spatially explicit wolf–caribou encounter models. The models were parameterized using Global Positioning System (GPS) data, hidden Markov models (HMMs), and information from the published literature. Complete LF restoration decreased wolf traveling speed and thus reduced caribou mortality. The proportional reduction in adult caribou mortality ranged from 10 to 25% of its original value, and the proportional reduction in calf mortality ranged from 8 to 23%, depending on caribou density, number of wolf packs, kill probability given an encounter, and detection distance of wolves for caribou. Building on the model output, we used empirical caribou data to calculate the effects of reduced mortalities on the finite rate of annual population change, . Assuming that 25% or less of calf mortality was wolf‐related, stayed below one, that is, populations kept declining, even with complete LF restoration. With 50% of calf mortality due to wolves, caribou populations stopped declining () if adult and calf mortality were reduced by at least 19 to 24%. However, these values were not achieved in a majority of the parameter combinations in our study, not even with complete LF restoration. Given that LF restoration as a single measure is unlikely to stop boreal caribou populations from declining, we used a case example to illustrate how LF restoration could make a small contribution in a portfolio of short‐term and long‐term management options to reduce wolf predation on caribou.

Highlights

  • Populations of boreal caribou, an ecotype of the woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) subspecies, are declining in Canada (Environment Canada 2017)

  • We modeled the effects of linear features (LFs) restoration on predation risk for caribou by wolves

  • Reduced wolf moving speed was responsible for reduced prey mortalities in our model

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Populations of boreal caribou, an ecotype of the woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) subspecies, are declining in Canada (Environment Canada 2017). Wolf densities increased near caribou habitats, resulting in more spatial overlap of wolves and caribou and a 10-fold increase in caribou in wolf diet (Latham et al 2011b) Another factor that enhances wolf predation on caribou is the use of human-made linear features (LFs) as wolf traveling paths (Apps et al 2013). We used these new GPS data to develop a more mechanistic approach to estimating the effects of LF restoration on caribou survival and population recovery. We first estimated wolf movement parameters from GPS data using a hidden Markov model (HMM), taking into consideration wolf use of LFs. Building on this, we developed spatially explicit wolf–prey encounter models to simulate effects of LF restoration on caribou mortalities.

LF length LF density Days
ESTIMATING EFFECTS OF LF RESTORATION ON CARIBOU POPULATION GROWTH RATES
Scenario n Prey
LINEAR FEATURE RESTORATION AND OTHER CONSERVATION MEASURES
DISCUSSION
LITERATURE CITED
Findings
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.