Site-directed mutagenesis of the m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. Analysis of the role of N-glycosylation in receptor expression and function.

Abstract

The cardiac m2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) is a sialoglycosylated transmembrane protein which has three potential sites for N-glycosylation (namely, Asn2, Asn3, and Asn6). To investigate the role of N-linked oligosaccharide(s) in the expression and function of the receptor, we constructed glycosylation-defective mutant receptor genes in which the three asparagine codons were substituted by codons for either aspartate (Asp2,3,6), lysine (Lys2,3,6), or glutamine (Gln2,3,6). The glycosylation-defective and wild-type receptor genes were stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Binding experiments with the membrane-permeable radioligand [3H]quinuclidinyl-benzilate and the membrane-impermeable radioligand [3H]N-methylscopolamine revealed that the Asp2,3,6, Gln2,3,6, and wild-type receptors were located exclusively on the cell surface and expressed in similar numbers. The Lys2,3,6 mutant receptor was expressed at a relatively low level and was therefore not included in subsequent experiments. Wheat germ agglutinin-Sepharose chromatography and sodium dodecyl sulfate-urea polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis demonstrated that the wild-type receptor, but not the Asp2,3,6 and Gln2,3,6 mutant receptors were N-glycosylated. The Asp2,3,6 and Gln2,3,6 mutant receptors had the same affinities for mAChR ligands as wild-type receptors. The time courses for degradation of the Asp2,3,6, Gln2,3,6, and wild-type receptors were also similar. In vivo functional analysis of the ability of the glycosylation mutant receptors to inhibit forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation revealed that maximal inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity was similar in the mutant and wild-type receptors. The Asp2,3,6 mutant receptor had an unaltered IC50 value for carbachol while the IC50 value of the Gln2,3,6 mutant receptor was 2-fold higher than that of the wild-type receptor. These results indicate that N-glycosylation of the m2 mAChR is not required for cell surface localization or ligand binding and does not confer increased stability against receptor degradation. Furthermore, N-glycosylation of the m2 mAChR is not required for functional coupling of the m2 mAChR to inhibition of adenylate cyclase.