Abstract
PurposeOperative management of giant omphalocele that cannot be closed primarily varies based on several factors, and there is little data to guide choice of operative approach and how this impacts long-term outcomes. We aimed to characterize whether surgical approach – staged closure during the neonatal period, or delayed closure – affects outcomes. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of children treated for giant omphalocele who did not undergo primary closure at Children's Hospital Colorado from 2010–2022. We included patients with giant omphalocele who underwent treatment at the study site. Data collected included patient characteristics, clinical course, and outcomes. Comparisons were made based on type of closure, delayed versus staged. ResultsWe identified 24 patients; 6 delayed and 16 staged. 2 patients died prior to closure. Delayed and staged groups did not differ regarding demographics. Infants undergoing staged repair tended to have more total hospital and total ventilator days, and more post-closure ventral hernia requiring repair; short-term outcomes were otherwise comparable. There was no difference between groups in long-term outcomes, including neurodevelopmental milestones and mortality. ConclusionsLong term outcomes are equivalent between staged repair and delayed repair of giant omphalocele. However, staged repair may be associated with more ventilator days, total hospital days and higher risk of ventral hernia.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.