Simultaneous resection of pancreatic cancer and liver metastases following total neoadjuvant therapy: A case series and analysis of the National Cancer Database.

The surgical strategy for treatment of synchronous liver metastases from colorectal cancer remains controversial. This retrospective analysis was conducted to compare the postoperative outcome and survival of patients receiving simultaneous resection of liver metastases and primary colorectal cancer to those receiving staged resection. Between January 1988 and September 2005, 219 patients underwent liver resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastases, of whom, 40 patients received simultaneous resection of liver metastases and primary colorectal cancer, and 179 patients staged resections. Patients were identified from a prospective database, and records were retrospectively reviewed. Patient, tumor, and operative parameters were analyzed for their influence on postoperative morbidity and mortality as well as on long-term survival. Simultaneous liver resections tend to be performed for colon primaries rather than for rectal cancer (p = 0.004) and used less extensive liver resections (p < 0.001). The postoperative morbidity was comparable between both groups, whereas the mortality was significantly higher in patients with simultaneous liver resection (p = 0.012). The mortality after simultaneous liver resection (n = 4) occurred after major hepatectomies, and three of these four patients were 70 years of age or older. There was no significant difference in long-term survival after formally curative simultaneous and staged liver resection. Simultaneous liver and colorectal resection is as efficient as staged resections in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases. To perform simultaneous resections safely a careful patient selection is necessary. The most important criteria to select patients for simultaneous liver resection are age of the patient and extent of liver resection.

Simultaneous liver and colorectal resections are safe for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis.

Aim At presentation, 15-20% of patients with rectal cancer already have synchronous liver metastases. The aim of this study was to determine the surgical and survival outcomes in patients with advanced rectal cancer who underwent combined pelvic exenteration and liver (oligometastatic) resection. Method Data from 20 international institutions that performed simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection between 2007 and 2017 were accumulated. Primarily, we examined perioperative outcomes, morbidity and mortality. We also assessed the impact that margin status had on survival. Results Of 128 patients, 72 (56.2%) were men with a median age of 60 years [interquartile range (IQR) 15 years]. The median size of the liver oligometastatic deposits was 2 cm (IQR 1.8 cm). The median duration of surgery was 406 min (IQR 240 min), with a median blood loss of 1090 ml (IQR 2010 ml). A negative resection margin (R0 resection) was achieved in 73.5% of pelvic exenterations and 66.4% of liver resections. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.6%, and 32% of patients had a major postoperative complication. The 5-year overall survival for patients in whom an R0 resection of both primary and metastatic disease was achieved was 54.6% compared with 20% for those with an R1/R2 resection (P = 0.006). Conclusion Simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection is feasible, with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Simultaneous resection should only be performed where an R0 resection of both pelvic and hepatic disease is anticipated.

At presentation, 15-20% of patients with rectal cancer already have synchronous liver metastases. The aim of this study was to determine the surgical and survival outcomes in patients with advanced rectal cancer who underwent combined pelvic exenteration and liver (oligometastatic) resection. Data from 20 international institutions that performed simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection between 2007 and 2017 were accumulated. Primarily, we examined perioperative outcomes, morbidity and mortality. We also assessed the impact that margin status had on survival. Of 128 patients, 72 (56.2%) were men with a median age of 60years [interquartile range (IQR) 15years]. The median size of the liver oligometastatic deposits was 2cm (IQR 1.8cm). The median duration of surgery was 406min (IQR 240min), with a median blood loss of 1090ml (IQR 2010ml). A negative resection margin (R0 resection) was achieved in 73.5% of pelvic exenterations and 66.4% of liver resections. The 30-day mortality rate was 1.6%, and 32% of patients had a major postoperative complication. The 5-year overall survival for patients in whom an R0 resection of both primary and metastatic disease was achieved was 54.6% compared with 20% for those with an R1/R2 resection (P=0.006). Simultaneous pelvic exenteration and liver resection is feasible, with acceptable morbidity and mortality. Simultaneous resection should only be performed where an R0 resection of both pelvic and hepatic disease is anticipated.

The morbidity of simultaneous pancreatic and liver resection for metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.

Metastatic liver disease is a challenging and life-threatening situation often with dismal prognosis. Nearly half of the patients with colorectal cancer develop liver metastasis during the course of their diseases. Hepatic resection is the treatment of choice in patients with colorectal liver metastasis. This study was conducted to compare the results of patients undergoing simultaneous liver and colorectal resection for synchronous liver metastasis and of those for whom a colorectal and liver resection was made separately. A retrospective analysis was performed on 1597 patients who underwent surgery because of colorectal cancer between January 1999 and December 2008. The results of the treatment were separately evaluated in case of the 152 patients who had liver metastasis. The proportion of the liver metastasis was 9.52%. The metastases arose in 40.8% from the rectum and in 31.8% from the sigmoid colon. It proved to be inoperable in 109 (71.7%) of the 152 patients who had liver metastasis. Simultaneous liver resection was performed because of synchronous metastasis in 14 (32.6%) cases (Group 1) and two step resection in 29 (67.4%) cases (Group 2). In case of synchronous operations only minor liver surgery was done. The mean size of the metastasis was 2.6 cm in diameter in Group 1 and 4.6 cm in Group 2 (p<0.005). The transfused blood volume was 0.3 U/patient. Only minor complications could be observed in Group 1. The hospitalization was 13.1 days in Group 1 and 11.7 days in Group 2. The mean survival time was 37.3 and 47.9 months (p<0.005). Simultaneous liver resection seems to be a safe procedure on those patients who develop small metastases with a limited number. However, the optimal timing of the liver resection and the identification of patients who will have the greatest benefit in survival still remain obscure.

Synchronous colorectal carcinoma (SCRC) indicates more than one primary colorectal carcinoma (CRC) discovered at the time of initial presentation, accounts for 3.1%-3.9% of CRC, and may occur either in the same or in different colorectal segments. The accurate preoperative diagnosis of SCRC is difficult and diagnostic failures may lead to inappropriate treatment and poorer prognosis. SCRC requires colorectal resections tailored to individual patients, based on the number, location, and stage of the tumours, from conventional or extended hemicolectomies to total colectomy or proctocolectomy, when established predisposing conditions exist. The overall perioperative risks of surgery for SCRC seem to be higher than for solitary CRC. Simultaneous colorectal and liver resection represents an appealing surgical strategy in selected patients with CRC and synchronous liver metastases (CRLM), even though the cumulative risks of the two procedures need to be adequately evaluated. Simultaneous resections have the noticeable advantage of avoiding a second laparotomy, give the opportunity of an earlier initiation of adjuvant therapy, and may significantly reduce the hospital costs. Because an increasing number of recent studies have shown good results, with morbidity, perioperative hospitalization, and mortality rates comparable to staged resections, simultaneous procedures can be selectively proposed even in case of complex colorectal resections, including those for SCRC and rectal cancer. However, in patients with multiple bilobar CRLM, major hepatectomies performed simultaneously with colorectal resection have been associated with significant perioperative risks. Conservative or parenchymal-sparing hepatectomies reduce the extent of hepatectomy while preserving oncological radicality, and may represent the best option for selected patients with multiple CRLM involving both liver lobes. Parenchymal-sparing liver resection, instead of major or two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar disease, seemingly reduces the overall operative risk of candidates to simultaneous colorectal and liver resection, and may represent the most appropriate surgical strategy whenever possible, also for patients with advanced SCRC and multiple bilobar liver metastases.

Background: Simultaneous liver resection and peritoneal cytoreduction with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial today. The aim of the study was to analyze the postoperative outcomes and survival of patients with advanced metastatic colon cancer (peritoneal and/or liver metastases). Methods: Retrospective observational study from a prospective maintained data base. Patients who underwent a simultaneous peritoneal cytoreduction and liver resection plus HIPEC were studied. Postoperative outcomes and overall and disease free survival were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: From January 2010 to October 2022, 22 patients operated with peritoneal and liver metastasis (LR+) were compared with 87 patients operated with peritoneal metastasis alone (LR-). LR+ group presented higher serious morbidity (36.4 vs. 14.9%; p: 0.034). Postoperative mortality did not reach statistical difference. Median overall and disease free survival was similar. Peritoneal carcinomatosis index was the only predictive factor of survival. Conclusions: Simultaneous peritoneal and liver resection is associated with increased postoperative morbidity and hospital stay, but with similar postoperative mortality and OS and disease free survival. These results reflect the evolution of these patients, considered inoperable until recently, and justify the trend to incorporate this surgical strategy within a multimodal therapeutic plan in highly selected patients.

Synchronous hepatic lesions account for 15-25% of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer and its optimal timing to surgery is not completely defined, but simultaneous colorectal and liver resection is recently gaining acceptance, at least in patients with a right colonic primary and liver metastases that need a minor hepatectomy to be fully resected. From September 2002 to December 2004, 16 patients underwent simultaneous resection as treatment of synchronous colorectal liver resection; in 10 patients (62.5%) a major hepatectomy was performed. The mean duration of intervention was 322.5 +/- 59.5 min, operative mortality and morbidity rates was 0% and 25% respectively; the hospitalization was 14.4 (range 8-60) days on average. Mean follow-up was 14 months and actuarial survival was 76.5% at 1 year and 63.5% at 2 years. We concluded that simultaneous colonic and liver resection should be undertaken in selected patients with synchronous colorectal liver resection regardless of the extent of hepatectomy; major liver resection, in fact, seems capable of providing better oncological results, allowing resection of liver micrometastases that, in almost one-third of the patients, are located in the same liver lobe of macroscopic lesions, without increased morbidity rates.

Surgical strategy for the treatment of resectable synchronous hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess safety of simultaneous colon and liver rese cions and the direct effects of this type of treatment upon morbidity and mortality of the patients with synchronus hepatic metastases of CRC. Intraoperative and postoperative data of 31 patients with simultaneous liver and colorectal resection were compared with the data of 51 patients who had undergone colon and hepatic resection in the staging setting. Analized were demographic data, number of metastases, type of the liver resection, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, percentage of postoperative complications, morbidity and mortality and lenght of hospitalisation. In the group of the patients operated simultaneously 5 hepatectomies, 3 sectionectomies, 2 trisegmentectomies, 3 bisegmentectomy, 6 segmentectomies, and 12 metastasectomies were combined with colon resection. In this group operation time (280 vs. 330 minutes) and in traoperative blood loss (450 vs. 820 ml) were lower than those in the two staged operation group. Postoperative complication rate was lower in the simultaneous group (19.35%o) than in the two-staged operation group (19.60%), without statistical significance. There was no hospital mortality in both groups. The patients having simultaneous resection required fewer days in the hospital (median 10.2 days) than the patients undergone operation in the two stage (18.34 days). By avoiding a second laparotomy, overall operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and complication rate are reduced with no change in hospital mortality, so simultaneous colon and hepatic resection performed by the competent surgeons are safe and efficient for the treatment of synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

Synchronous liver metastases occur in approximately 15-20% of patients with colorectal cancer. Optimal oncological treatment of oligometastatic disease combines surgical resection and systemic therapy. Open simultaneous resection of the primary and liver metastases is well described, but there is not much evidence for the increasing use of the minimally invasive approach. We here report the results of our experience of simultaneous minimally invasive resections. A prospective database of patients with resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) at the Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin was used for retrospective data analysis. We report all patients undergoing simultaneous minimal invasive resection of colorectal cancer and its synchronous liver metastases between May 2015 and December 2021. Out of 281 patients undergoing resection of CRLM, 33 (11.7%) patients had simultaneous minimal invasive resection of the colorectal primary. The primary tumor was located mostly within the rectum (n = 17; 48.6%), followed by the descending colon (n = 6; 17.1%). CRLM were localized in both liver lobes in 69.7% (n = 23) of cases. Following resection of the colorectal tumor, an anastomosis was performed in 31 of 33 patients (93.9%), with no anastomotic leakage observed in the follow up. Simultaneous liver resections were performed mostly as subsegment (n = 20) or bisegment resections (n = 11). Mean IWATE-Score of all hepatic resections was 5.5 (± 2.4). Complication rates (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3) were similar compared between low/intermediate and advanced/expert difficulty for liver resection (n = 4, 17.4% vs. n = 2, 20.0%; p = 1.0). In one case conversion to open resection was required. Our data indicate that simultaneous minimal invasive resection of CRLM and the primary tumor is a safe and feasible procedure. Complication rates were consistent across different levels of difficulty (low to expert) in liver resections. Therefore, indications for simultaneous resection may be expanded.

Management of patients with T3/4 and/or N+ mid/low rectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases is not codified. The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of our approach which consists of neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, according to liver disease extension, followed by simultaneous rectal and liver resection. Between 2000 and 2009, 354 patients underwent hepatectomy for synchronous metastases. Thirty-six consecutive patients who underwent rectal and liver resection for metastatic T3/4 and/or N+ mid/low rectal cancer were analyzed. Liver metastases were multiple in 27 patients, bilobar in 22, and >5 cm in six. Up-front treatment was chemotherapy in 15 patients, chemoradiotherapy in seven, chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in six, and surgery in eight (five symptomatic tumors). After chemotherapy alone (median number of cycles = 6), primary tumor response was observed in 11 patients (three complete responses). After chemoradiotherapy, only one patient had liver disease progression. Eighty-nine percent of patients underwent simultaneous rectal and hepatic resection. Mortality and morbidity rates were 2.8% (one pulmonary embolism) and 36%, respectively. After a mean follow-up of 39 months, 5-year overall and disease-free survival were 59.3 and 39.6%, respectively. Twenty-one patients had recurrence, including three pelvic recurrences (8.3%). No pelvic recurrence occurred among patients who correctly completed treatment strategy. All patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were alive and disease-free; 5-year overall and disease-free survival of patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy were 59.3 and 25%, respectively. For patients with metastatic T3/4 and/or N+ mid/low rectal cancer, the present strategy was safe and effective. Good disease control was achieved by neoadjuvant treatments, low morbidity rates were associated with simultaneous resection, and excellent long-term outcomes with low local relapse rate were obtained.

Backround. Pancreas resection is the only curative treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. In the event of unexpected incidental liver metastases during operative exploration patients were traditionally referred to palliative treatment arms. With continuous progress in the surgical expertise simultaneous pancreas and liver resections seem technically feasible nowadays. The aim of this study therefore was to analyze the impact of synchronous liver-directed therapy on operative outcome and overall survival in patients with hepatic metastasized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (HMPA). Methods. 22 patients who underwent simultaneous pancreas resection and liver-directed therapy for HMPA between January 1, 2004 and January 1, 2009 were compared to 22 patients who underwent classic pancreas resection for nonmetastasized pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NMPA) in a matched pair study design. Postoperative morbidity, preoperative, and operative data and overall survival were analyzed. Results. Overall survival was significantly decreased in the HMPA group. Postoperative morbidity and mortality and median operation time did not significantly differ between the groups. Conclusion. The results of our study showed that simultaneous pancreas resection and liver-directed therapy may safely be performed and may therefore be applied in individual patients with HMPA. However, a potential benefit of this radical surgical approach with regard to overall survival and/or quality of life remains to be proven.

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer worldwide, with 15-25% of patients presenting synchronous liver metastases (UICC stage IV). Surgical resection remains crucial, but the optimal sequence for managing synchronous metastases is debated. This study evaluates the impact of different surgical strategies on survival in colorectal cancer patients with liver-only metastases (CRLM) and identifies factors influencing mortality. This retrospective cohort study analyzed CRLM patients from German cancer registries in Brandenburg and Berlin from 2017 to 2022, grouped by surgical treatment sequence: simultaneous primary tumor resection (PTR) and liver resection, PTR before liver resection, or liver resection before PTR. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses evaluated overall survival (OS) and the impact of systemic therapy and patient characteristics. Among 23,394 colorectal cancer patients, 209 met inclusion criteria. Simultaneous resection was performed in 45% (N = 93), PTR before liver resection in 43% (N = 90), and liver resection first in 12% (N = 26). PTR before liver resection showed the best 5-year OS (68% vs. 53% for simultaneous surgery; HR 0.44, 95% CI = 0.22-0.88, p = 0.020). Simultaneous resection had the highest 30-day mortality (6.5%, N = 6). Postoperative chemotherapy significantly improved 5-year OS (66% vs. 57% for no chemotherapy; HR 0.45, 95% CI = 0.22-0.95, p = 0.036). Excluding 30-day mortality, survival differences diminished. Primary tumor resection before liver resection appears to improve long-term survival in CRLM patients. Simultaneous resection should be carefully considered due to increased mortality, particularly in older patients with lower performance status undergoing major liver surgery. Postoperative chemotherapy enhances survival, emphasizing the need for tailored treatment strategies.

In patients with colon cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, treatment algorithms are complex and often require multidisciplinary evaluation. Neoadjuvant therapy is frequently utilized, but there is an unclear relationship with postoperative outcomes in patients with simultaneous resection. This is a retrospective cohort study from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and Targeted Colectomy databases. All patients with stage IV colon cancer undergoing simultaneous colectomy with synchronous liver metastasis resection or ablation between 2015 and 2019 were identified and categorized into subgroups based on receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess for risk factors of anastomotic leaks and serious postoperative complications. We identified 1006 patients who underwent simultaneous colectomy and liver operations. Of those, 418 (41.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy within 90 days of surgery, while 588 (58.4%) had simultaneous upfront surgery. On multivariable logistic regression, neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with postoperative anastomotic leaks (odds ratio [OR]:1.30; p = 0.39) or serious complications (OR: 1.04; p = 0.82). Neoadjuvant therapy does not increase postoperative complications in simultaneous colon and liver resections. These results may alleviate concerns regarding postoperative morbidity in the decision-making process of administering neoadjuvant therapy.