Abstract
Westinghouse Electric Company’s design for the Advanced Pressurized Water Reactor (AP-1000) incorporates a special in-vessel retention (IVR) device to enhance the capability of removing heat through the outer wall of the reactor vessel during a core meltdown. External Reactor Vessel Cooling (ERVC) is established by flooding the reactor cavity during a severe accident. The amount of heat removed is limited by the critical heat flux (CHF) at the outer surface of the vessel wall. In this paper, the CHF correlations developed specifically for this purpose are reviewed. The RELAP5-3D thermal-hydraulic code is used to simulate the natural convection flow within the water channel of the IVR device. The results of RELAP5-3D simulations are substituted into ULPU, SULTAN, SBLB, and KAIST critical heat flux correlations to determine the safety margin of the AP-1000 IVR design. Among these four correlations, the CHFs predicted by the ULPU and SBLB correlations are insensitive to the thermal-hydraulic conditions of the coolant channel. The CHF predicted by SULTAN is the lowest among the four correlations. The results demonstrate that the predicted CHF increases with the angle. Nevertheless, the ratio of CHF to heat flux is lowest around the upper quarter of the vessel. The heat load to the lower head is based on two bounding melt configurations. Configuration I involves a stratified light metallic layer on top of a molten ceramic pool, and Configuration II represents the condition that an additional heavy metal layer forms below the ceramic pool. The impact of corium pool configuration on the safety performance of IVR is very significant. Under Configuration II, as predicted by the SULTAN and KAIST correlations, the performance of the current AP-1000 IVR design is marginal. The results of the RELAP5-3D IVR simulation show that the total mass flow rate in the coolant channel increases sharply as the widths of the annular channels vary from 0.0762 to 0.762m. The mass-flow rate decreases gradually when the gap width increases beyond 0.762m. The KAIST CHF correlation predicts that CHF is maximal when the gap width is around 0.4572m and decreases gradually when the gap width increases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.