Abstract

We discuss execution costs in the global spot FX market where only limit orders are permitted. In this work we expand our approach for simulations of maker loss (Schmidt [2008]) to large orders that might notably affect price dynamics if they were submitted in real life. We discern three types of orders: (1) Maker orders: bid (offer) orders submitted at best bid (offer) price until they are completely filled. (2) Auto - match orders: bid (offer) orders submitted at best offer (bid) price but their unfilled remainders are submitted as maker orders. (3) Taker orders: buy (sell) orders submitted at sufficiently high (low) price to be immediately filled. We used the EBS/ICAP market data for EUR/USD in February 2009 for calibrating our simulation model and estimating maker loss. Besides sequential runs upon historical market data, we used also several resampling techniques: bootstrap, Monte Carlo Markov Chain, and random entry. We found that the latter method is preferable for our simulations. Our main conclusion in the early work for one-million orders (the minimal order size in the EBS market) holds also for multi-million orders: expected maker loss is lower than the taker loss. <b>TOPICS:</b>VAR and use of alternative risk measures of trading risk, volatility measures, simulations

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.