Abstract
Although typically applied in safety-critical domains such as aviation, transport, and nuclear power, there is a growing body of research focusing on the application of sociotechnical systems theory to led outdoor activity systems. Antagonists of this approach have argued that led outdoor activities are simple and therefore that a complex sociotechnical systems approach is invalid and unwarranted. This paper seeks to determine whether led outdoor activity systems are complex by comparing their characteristics to established characteristics of complexity theory and sociotechnical systems theory. Features of led outdoor activity work systems are decomposed and compared with theoretical benchmarks of complexity. The findings show that systems of work that afford these simple experiences are indeed both complex and sociotechnical in nature. It is concluded that application of sociotechnical systems theory and methods is both appropriate and required to attain improvements in practice and safety. Implications for further research and practice are discussed.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.