Abstract
Psychoacoustic threshold detection measurements are widely used in clinical and research applications. A variety of procedures has been described to measure psychoacoustic thresholds. Each of these procedures has advantages and disadvantages. For clinical purposes procedures providing fast results may be preferred whereas for psychoacoustic research the threshold has to be determined as exactly as possible. Conventional procedures are based on a yes/no paradigm. Since these procedures are influenced by criterion shifts, n-alternative forced choice procedures were developed. Here the patient has to indicate the interval most likely to contain the signal. Additionally, it is possible to estimate the threshold based upon few data and comparing these to known psychometric functions. Following an overview outlining procedural aspects of threshold detection methods aspects of signal detection theory in relation to these procedures are discussed. Signal detection theory may help to explain why results obtained with various procedures may be quite different.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
