Abstract
Sigma metric analysis was conducted across two New Zealand Blood Services (NZBS) laboratories (Auckland and Christchurch) to optimize quality control (QC) procedures. We evaluated five assays (anti-HCV, HIV Ag/Ab combo, HTLV-I/II, HBsAg, and Syphilis) using internal quality control (IQC) and third-party daily QC data extracted from four Architect i2000SR instruments during Jan 2 -31st, 2023. Mean, standard deviation (SD), and coefficient of variation (CV%) were calculated, assuming zero bias. Sigma metrics were determined using the Total Allowable Error (TEa %) based on difference between positive control mean and signal-to-cutoff (s/co) cut-off. Most assays exhibited CV% values ≤10 % except for HBsAg IQC (18.5 %) and anti-HCV third-party QC (13.4 %) at Christchurch. TEa % ranged from 38 % to 90 %. Overall, the assays demonstrated Six Sigma performance (σ > 6), except for HBsAg IQC (3.97) and anti-HCV third-party QC (5.46) at Christchurch. These high-quality serology assays can benefit from simplified QC design without compromising blood safety.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
