Abstract

Abstract The National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) Regional Spectral Model (RSM) is used to produce twice-daily (0000 and 1200 UTC), high-resolution ensemble forecasts to 24 h. The forecasts are performed at an equivalent horizontal grid spacing of 12 km for the period 1 November 2002 to 31 March 2003 over the southwest United States. The performance of 6-h accumulated precipitation is assessed for 32 U.S. Geological Survey hydrologic catchments. Multiple accuracy and skill measures are used to evaluate probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts. NCEP stage-IV precipitation analyses are used as “truth,” with verification performed on the stage-IV 4-km grid. The RSM ensemble exhibits a ubiquitous wet bias. The bias manifests itself in areal coverage, frequency of occurrence, and total accumulated precipitation over every region and during every 6-h period. The biases become particularly acute starting with the 1800–0000 UTC interval, which leads to a spurious diurnal cycle and the 1200 UTC cycle being more adversely affected than the 0000 UTC cycle. Forecast quality and value exhibit marked variability over different hydrologic regions. The forecasts are highly skillful along coastal California and the windward slopes of the Sierra Nevada Mountains, but they generally lack skill over the Great Basin and the Colorado basin except over mountain peaks. The RSM ensemble is able to discriminate precipitation events and provide useful guidance to a wide range of users over most regions of California, which suggests that mitigation of the conditional biases through statistical postprocessing would produce major improvements in skill.

Highlights

  • The purpose of this paper is to explore the utility of 6-hourly probabilistic quantitative precipitation forecasts (PQPFs) for the same set of forecasts documented by Yuan et al (2005a)

  • The 4-km National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) stage-IV precipitation analyses were used for verification, with the model output interpolated to the finer 4-km grid

  • The spatial variability and temporal evolution of the forecast skill were assessed for 32 catchments inside of the four U.S Geological Survey (USGS) hydrologic regions of the southwest United States

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cool season precipitation plays a central role in determining snowpack, runoff, and streamflow over the. Discrepancies exist between the 0000 and 1200 UTC forecast cycles, with 0000 UTC runs being more skillful. Hydrologists desire accurate estimates of quantitative precipitation amount and type at the finest possible spatial and temporal scale for flood and river flow forecasting models (Droegemeier et al 2000). Operational streamflow models at the National Weather Service River Forecast Centers (RFCs) currently input 6-h precipitation totals (Charba et al 2003), not 24-h accumulations. Besides being of greater operational relevance, analysis of 6-h accumulation should help elucidate the differences at each 6-h forecast period between the skill of the 0000 and 1200 UTC forecasts and possibly reveal the reasons for the discrepancies.

The RSM ensemble system and verification method
Domain-averaged performance
Regional performance for watersheds of the Southwest
Findings
Summary
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.