Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine whether short sleep duration is associated with poor receptive vocabulary at age 10years. In the Quebec Longitudinal Study of Child Development, parents reported their children's nocturnal sleep duration annually from ages 2.5 to 10years, and children were assessed for receptive vocabulary using the Peabody PictureVocabulary Test-Revised (PPVT-R) at ages 4 and 10years. Groups with distinct nocturnal sleep duration trajectories were identified and the relationships between sleep trajectories and poor PPVT-R performance were characterized. In all, 1192 children with available sleep duration and PPVT-R data participated in this epidemiological study. We identified four longitudinal nocturnal sleep trajectories: short persistent sleepers (n=72, 6.0%), short increasing sleepers (n=47, 3.9%), 10-h sleepers (n=628, 52.7%) and 11-h sleepers (n=445, 37.3%). In all, 14.8% of the children showed poor PPVT-R performance at age 10years. Nocturnal sleep trajectories and poor PPVT-R performance at age 10 were associated significantly (P=0.003). After adjusting for baseline receptive vocabulary performance at age 4 and other potential confounding variables, logistic regression analyses suggest that, compared to 11-h sleepers, the odds ratio of presenting poor receptive vocabulary at age 10 was 2.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.24-5.74, P=0.012] for short persistent sleepers and 1.66 (95% CI: 1.06-2.59, P=0.026) for 10-h sleepers. These results corroborate previous findings in early childhood, and indicate that short sleep duration is associated with poor receptive vocabulary during middle childhood.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.