Abstract

Device closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) and patent foramen ovale (PFO) are both associated with short- and long-term complications. Our knowledge of the complication rates of ASD and PFO closure is limited. Our objective was to review the peri-procedural and long-term complications of ASD and PFO closure. Medline, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were searched between 1973 and 2012. A total of 28,142 patients from 203 case series were included. Of these 203 articles, 111 were reporting ASD closure, 61 were reporting PFO closure, and 31 were reporting both. Pooled incidence rates of cardiac complications were calculated separately for peri-procedural and at follow-up. Peri-procedural major complications were reported from 0% to 9.4%, with a pooled estimate rate of 1.4% (95% CI: 1.3-1.6%). It was 1.6% (95% CI: 1.4-1.8%) in ASD group, 1.1% (95% CI: 0.9-1.3%) in PFO group, and 1.3% (95% CI: 0.9-1.9%) in ASD/PFO group. The most common major complication was the device embolization requiring surgery. Peri-procedural minor complications were reported with a pooled estimate rate of 1.4% (95% CI: 1.2-1.7%). It was 1.6% (95% CI: 1.2-2.1%) in ASD group, 1.3% (95% CI: 1.0-1.7%) in PFO group, and 1.5% (95% CI: 1.1-1.2.1%) in ASD/PFO group. The most frequent major complications at follow-up were cerebrovascular events [1.3% (95% CI: 1.1-1.6%)] and device thrombosis [1.2% (95% CI: 1.0-1.4%)]. Both were more frequent in PFO group. Device closure of ASD and PFO are associated with non-negligible serious complications, both in early and long-term.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.