Abstract
This paper attempts to analyse Abe’s statement from two perspectives – pre-release and post-release. The approach offers an insight into how analysts were wrong/right and how different the Abe statement was from the report released by the Advisory Committee. The paper attempts to offer a balanced view of the statement while recognising the reservations from Japan’s neighbours. Comparisons between the pre-release and post-release phases would be made.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
