Abstract

ABSTRACT Today, Shimizu Ikutarō is mostly remembered as a leading leftwing intellectual and political activist that turned conservative and advocated for Japan to become a nuclear power. Especially outside of Japan, this has made Shimizu persona non grata. Nevertheless, despite the very questionable nature of his later thought, Shimizu remains one of the most influential scholars in postwar Japanese history. More in depth scholarship on his later theory can cast light on his whole career and on its relation not only to the Japanese cultural and political dynamics after the 1960s, but also to the international intellectual environment of that period. The present article takes Shimizu’s claim to a theoretically justified turn (tenkō) at face value: it reconstructs and criticises the Japanese sociologist’s work with the tools of global intellectual history, focusing on his evocative but distortive use of eighteenth century philosopher Giambattista Vico. Through this analysis, it suggests how Shimizu used Vichian themes, such as the meaning of common sense and the opposition between ars topica and ars critica, to conceptualise his problematic political stances concerning aspects of public life such as education and the role of the intellectual elite in society.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.