Abstract
Abstract Five interpretations of sexual education are distinguished. The analyses indicate that sexual education can neither be understood as learning to control the sexual impulses’, nor as ‘the training or formation of sexual desire’. Elucidation of the meaning of the terms ‘sexual desire’ and ‘erotic love’ show that ‘sexual education’ can be understood as teaching (children) the moral tendencies in reference to sexual conduct. It is argued that infantile sexual desire’ is based on a contradiction in terms and that ‘erotic love’ does not exclude moral principles.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
