Serum 25(OH)D levels are causally linked to height in European population: A mendelian randomization study

Genetic liability to acne is associated with increased risk of inflammatory bowel disease: A Mendelian randomization study

Given the uncertainties surrounding the associations in previous epidemiological studies, we conducted linear and nonlinear Mendelian randomization (MR) studies to evaluate whether body mass index (BMI) associated with gastric cancer (GC) risk in European and Korean. Genome-wide association study-summary statistics were used from the Pan-UK Biobank, the Genetic Investigation of Anthropometric Traits consortium, the K-CHIP consortium, and BioBank Japan. BMI-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used as instrumental variables (IVs) in MR to identify the association between BMI and GC. Both linear and nonlinear MR analyses were performed. Sensitivity analyses were also conducted for individuals below or above a BMI of 24kg/m2. The study used 22 and 55 SNPs as IVs for BMI in European and Korean populations, respectively. Genetically predicted BMI was positively associated with GC risk in the European population (Odds ratio per 1kg/m2 increase; 95% CI = 1.17; 1.01-1.36 using simple median method), but no significant association was observed in the Korean population. However, the nonlinear MR identified a U-shaped association between BMI and GC in the Korean population, with both low and high BMIs associated with increased GC risk. A BMI of 24kg/m2 presented the lowest risk. Sensitivity analyses did not yield any genome-wide significant SNPs. While MR analysis suggests a linear association between BMI and GC in those of European ancestry, nonlinear MR hints at a U-shaped association in Koreans. This suggests the association between BMI and GC risk may vary according to ethnic ancestry.

Establishing new approaches for the prevention and treatment of stroke relies on identifying modifiable risk factors that contribute to the development of this complex disease. Mendelian randomization (MR) studies, analogous to naturally occurring randomized trials, can assess causality of potentially modifiable biomarkers and offer new insights into biological pathways. Stroke is the second leading cause of death worldwide and the chief determinant of long-term disability. Stroke is a heterogeneous disease arising from several distinct underlying pathologies and is typically classified as ischemic or hemorrhagic, and further subclassified using imaging data. Ischemic stroke (IS), including its 3 main subtypes: small vessel disease, large vessel disease, and cardioembolic stroke, accounts for ≈80% of stroke and is the result of an interrupted blood supply, leading to localized areas of ischemia in the brain. Small vessel disease may be a consequence of nonatherosclerotic, as well as atherosclerotic, mechanisms that result in an occlusion of the small perforating arteries, whereas large vessel disease results from occlusions or emboli from plaque rupture in larger vessels, such as a carotid artery. Cardioembolic stroke arises typically from emboli from the heart. By contrast, hemorrhagic stroke is a consequence of intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding into the brain) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding into the subarachnoid space). These diverse stroke subtypes have distinct underlying pathologies reflecting different risk factor distributions. MR studies, using genetic variants as instrumental variables, afford a powerful approach to assessing causality of risk factors and avoid biases inherent in observational studies, including confounding and reverse causation. This review considers the contribution of MR studies to stroke epidemiology and their relevance to understanding risk factors and new therapeutic targets for stroke. Meta-analyses of large prospective studies have enhanced our knowledge of classical and emerging risk factors for stroke.1–4 Classical risk factors for stroke include nonmodifiable characteristics, …

This study aims to review the evidence from Mendelian randomization (MR) studies on the causal role of vitamin D in type 2 diabetes (T2D). A systematic search (registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024551731)) was performed in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for publications up to June 2024. MR studies including vitamin D as the exposure and T2D as the outcome were included. Among the 22 studies included, which were mainly in European populations, half used single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located on vitamin D synthesis and metabolism genes, while others selected SNPs based on statistical thresholds. Negative associations implying that vitamin D protects against T2D were reported in three one-sample and three two-sample MR studies. The remaining studies reported null associations between genetically predicted circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of T2D regardless of MR design, study population, data source or SNP selection. Findings from MR studies on circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk of T2D do not consistently support the causal role of vitamin D in T2D in the general population. Future MR studies to examine the non-linear association of vitamin D with T2D or disease progression from prediabetes are warranted to clarify the use of vitamin D in the prevention of T2D.

The impact of appendectomy on the risk of gastrointestinal cancers remains unknown. We aimed to systematically estimate the causal relationship between appendectomy and gastrointestinal cancers in the European population using two-sample Mendelian randomization (TSMR) study methods and meta-analysis. As part of the discovery cohort analysis, we identified independent genetic variants strongly associated with appendectomy from the UK Biobank (50,105 cases) to serve as instrumental variables (IVs). Summary-level data for gastrointestinal cancers were obtained from the FinnGen study. As the replication cohort, IVs associated with appendectomy were extracted in the FinnGen study (28,601 cases). The data for gastrointestinal cancers were obtained from the UK Biobank. Finally, meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate the combined causal effects of the MR results. We found no causal relationship between appendectomy and gastrointestinal cancers in both the discovery and replication cohorts. Finally, the meta-analysis revealed no causal association between appendectomy and gastrointestinal cancers. Our findings suggest no causal relationship exists between appendectomy and gastrointestinal cancers in the European population. This genetic evidence supports the conclusion from other observational studies that appendectomy does not affect the risk of gastrointestinal cancers in the European population.

Introduction: With over 80, 000 new cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) diagnosed annually, modifiable risk factors remain unclear. Circadian disruption, linked to cancers like breast and prostate, affects immune cells (e.g., natural killer cells and T-helper cells) by altering their trafficking and proliferation. Some studies (PMID: 30566672, 27611440) suggest long sleep may increase overall NHL risk, including a Mendelian randomization (MR) study (PMID: 32895918). However, no research has examined the causal relationship between sleep traits, including long sleep, and NHL risk, by subtypes. We hypothesize that sleep traits are causally associated with NHL subtypes in European populations, testing this using MR with data from the International Lymphoma Epidemiology Consortium (InterLymph). Methods: We conducted two-sample MR using genome-wide association studies (GWAS) summary data for sleep traits and NHL subtypes. Only independent, genome-wide significant (p < 5×10-8) Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as valid instruments, sourced from the UK Biobank. Sleep traits included chronotype (153 SNPs), insomnia (48 SNPs), sleep duration (78 SNPs), excessive daytime sleepiness (37 SNPs), short sleep (27 SNPs), and long sleep (8 SNPs). NHL subtype data were from InterLymph: follicular lymphoma (6, 508 cases / 64, 183 controls), mantle cell lymphoma (1, 169 cases / 61, 603 controls), Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (WM/LPL: 1, 697 cases / 59, 333 controls), and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (8, 522 cases / 67, 653 controls). The primary analysis used inverse-variance weighted (IVW) random-effects, with MR-Egger for pleiotropy adjustment. Results: Using the IVW method, we did not identify any statistically significant causal association between sleep traits and the risk of NHL subtypes, but did yield several intriguing trends. Long sleep (sleep duration >= 9 h per night) showed a marginally increased NHL risk [Odds ratio (OR) range: 1.51 - 247.9] across each subtype. Short sleep (sleep duration < 7 h per night) showed a similar trend [OR range: 1.25 - 1.81], except for WM/LPL, where we noticed a negative trend. The confidence limit for long sleep was imprecise due to the small number of variants. We did not notice any significant directional horizontal pleiotropy or weak instrument bias. Conclusions: We found no conclusive evidence of a relationship between sleep traits and four NHL subtypes. However, we see suggestive trends of long and short sleep associated with higher risk of some NHL subtypes. These findings align with the previous studies, which showed long sleep was associated with higher risk of NHL overall. Future directions include expanding our analysis to additional NHL subtypes, generating polygenic risk scores, and conducting stratified analyses. Citation Format: Pankhil Shah, Brittany Crawford, Anwar Merchant, Brenda Birmann, Angelica Macauda, Michelle A. Hildebrandt, Aaron Norman, Neil E. Caporaso, Meredith Yeager, Michael Dean, Immaculata De Vivo, Lynn Goldin, Nicola J. Camp, Rosalie Griffin, Delphine Casabonne, Federico Canzian, Pelin Unal, Elad Ziv, Catherine R. Marinac, Alexandra Nieters, Stephen J. Chanock, Mitchell J. Machiela, Michael Conry, Charlie Zhong, Hanla A. Park, Simon Cheah, Jonathan N. Hofmann, Elizabeth E. Brown, Celine Vachon, Susan Slager, Sonja Berndt, Sophia S. Wang, Vijai Joseph, James McKay, Henrik Hjalgrim, Lara Sucheston-Campbell, Karl Smith-Byrne, Alyssa Clay-Gilmour. Association between sleep traits and risk of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma subtypes: a mendelian randomization study in the International Lymphoma Epidemiology (InterLymph) Consortium [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 7415.

BackgroundCompelling evidence suggests that adiponectin is involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Nevertheless, a recent Mendelian randomization (MR) study in Europeans has shown that adiponectin does not have...

Association between Sleep Traits and Risk of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Subtypes: A Mendelian Randomization Study in the International Lymphoma (InterLymph) Epidemiology Consortium

BackgroundMuch observational research reported that tea consumption decreases the risk of osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and osteoporosis (OP) which are the three major bone disorders. However, the observed correlation is inconclusive. To determine the causal relationship between genetically predicted tea intake and OA, RA, and OP, we performed a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study based on large samples.MethodsThe European population’s genome-wide association meta-analysis (GWAS) dataset identified SNPs associated with tea consumption was obtained from Neale Lab’s analysis of UK Biobank data that comprised 349,376 participants of European ancestry. We extracted genetic data for knee OA (17,885 controls and 4,462 cases), hip OA (50,898 controls and 12,625 cases), and RA (43,923 controls and 14,361 cases) from the UK Biobank and OP cases (93083 controls and 1,175 cases) from FinnGen Data Freeze 2. A MR study was conducted to examine the effect of selected single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and OA, RA, and OP risk. Several sensitivity analyses were performed with weighted median and inverse-variance weighted methods for estimating the causal effects.ResultsIn this MR study, the genetically predicted per one cup increase of tea consumption was not associated with knee OA (OR 1.11,95% CI: 0.79–1.55) using IVW with random effect. Genetic predisposition to tea consumption was not associated with hip OA (OR: 1.20, 95% CI: 0.84–1.71), RA (OR: 1.24 95% CI: 0.81–1.91), and OP (OR: 1.11, 95% CI: 0.89, 1.39). Following the sensitivity analysis, there was no potential pleiotropy.ConclusionAccording to our study, According to our study, there was no statistical power to confirm a causal relationship between tea consumption and the risk of knee OA, hip OA, RA, and OP.

Previous observational studies focused on the association of tea intake and allergic diseases. However, it is not known whether these associations are causal. We used a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study to assess the causal relationship of tea intake with the risk of allergic diseases, such as atopic dermatitis (AD), allergic rhinitis (AR), and allergic asthma (AA). Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which had genetic statistical significance with tea intake were used as instrumental variables (IVs). We employed heritable IVs of tea intake from the UK Biobank, which included 447,485 samples. Sensitivity analyses were further performed using MR Egger and MR-PRESSO. Inverse variance weighted (IVW) method was used as the main approach. In this MR study, 40 independent SNPs were selected for tea intake. The MR analysis revealed that an increase in genetically predicted tea intake was associated with a lower risk of AD (OR = 0.709, 95% CI = 0.546-0.919, p = 0.009). Furthermore, we observed a causal effect of genetically predicted tea intake on the risk of AA (OR = 0.498, 95% CI = 0.320-0.776, p = 0.002). However, no significant causal relationship was found between genetically predicted tea intake and AR (OR = 1.008, 95% CI = 0.998-1.017, p = 0.115). Our MR analysis suggested that increased tea intake may reduce the risk of AD and AA in European population. This suggests that tea intake is likely a trigger or a prevention strategy for AD and AA.

Mendelian randomization (MR) studies are often described as naturally occurring randomized trials in which genetic factors are randomly assigned by nature. Conceptualizing MR studies as randomized trials has profound implications for their design, conduct, reporting, and interpretation. For example, analytic practices that are discouraged in randomized trials should also be discouraged in MR studies. Here, we deconstruct the oft-made analogy between MR and randomized trials. We describe four key threats to the analogy between MR studies and randomized trials: (1) exchangeability is not guaranteed; (2) time zero (and therefore the time for setting eligibility criteria) is unclear; (3) the treatment assignment is often measured with error; and (4) adherence is poorly defined. By precisely defining the causal effects being estimated, we underscore that MR estimates are often vaguely analogous to per-protocol effects in randomized trials, and that current MR methods for estimating analogues of per-protocol effects could be biased in practice. We conclude that the analogy between randomized trials and MR studies provides further perspective on both the strengths and the limitations of MR studies as currently implemented, as well as future directions for MR methodology development and application. In particular, the analogy highlights potential future directions for some MR studies to produce more interpretable and informative numerical estimates.

Mendelian randomization (MR) studies use genetic variation associated with modifiable exposures to assess their possible causal relationship with outcomes and aim to reduce potential bias from confounding and reverse causation. To develop the STROBE-MR Statement as a stand-alone extension to the STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guideline for the reporting of MR studies. The development of the STROBE-MR Statement followed the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) framework guidance and used the STROBE Statement as a starting point to draft a checklist tailored to MR studies. The project was initiated in 2018 by reviewing the literature on the reporting of instrumental variable and MR studies. A group of 17 experts, including MR methodologists, MR study design users, developers of previous reporting guidelines, and journal editors, participated in a workshop in May 2019 to define the scope of the Statement and draft the checklist. The draft checklist was published as a preprint in July 2019 and discussed on the preprint platform, in social media, and at the 4th Mendelian Randomization Conference. The checklist was then revised based on comments, further refined through 2020, and finalized in July 2021. The STROBE-MR checklist is organized into 6 sections (Title and Abstract, Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Other Information) and includes 20 main items and 30 subitems. It covers both 1-sample and 2-sample MR studies that assess 1 or multiple exposures and outcomes, and addresses MR studies that follow a genome-wide association study and are reported in the same article. The checklist asks authors to justify why MR is a helpful method to address the study question and state prespecified causal hypotheses. The measurement, quality, and selection of genetic variants must be described and attempts to assess validity of MR-specific assumptions should be well reported. An item on data sharing includes reporting when the data and statistical code required to replicate the analyses can be accessed. STROBE-MR provides guidelines for reporting MR studies. Improved reporting of these studies could facilitate their evaluation by editors, peer reviewers, researchers, clinicians, and other readers, and enhance the interpretation of their results.

BackgroundCirculating vitamin D has been associated with multiple clinical diseases in observational studies, but the association was inconsistent due to the presence of confounders. We conducted a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the healthy atlas of vitamin D in many clinical traits and evaluate their causal association.MethodsBased on a large-scale genome-wide association study (GWAS), the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) instruments of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) from 443,734 Europeans and the corresponding effects of 10 clinical diseases and 42 clinical traits in the European population were recruited to conduct a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study. Under the network of Mendelian randomization analysis, inverse-variance weighting (IVW), weighted median, weighted mode, and Mendelian randomization (MR)–Egger regression were performed to explore the causal effects and pleiotropy. Mendelian randomization pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO) was conducted to uncover and exclude pleiotropic SNPs.ResultsThe results revealed that genetically decreased vitamin D was inversely related to the estimated BMD (β = −0.029 g/cm2, p = 0.027), TC (β = −0.269 mmol/L, p = 0.006), TG (β = −0.208 mmol/L, p = 0.002), and pulse pressure (β = −0.241 mmHg, p = 0.043), while positively associated with lymphocyte count (β = 0.037%, p = 0.015). The results did not reveal any causal association of vitamin D with clinical diseases. On the contrary, genetically protected CKD was significantly associated with increased vitamin D (β = 0.056, p = 2.361 × 10−26).ConclusionThe putative causal effects of circulating vitamin D on estimated bone mass, plasma triglyceride, and total cholesterol were uncovered, but not on clinical diseases. Vitamin D may be linked to clinical disease by affecting health-related metabolic markers.

BackgroundNumerous observational studies have demonstrated that circulating lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] might be inversely related to the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, recent Mendelian randomization (MR) studies do not consistently support this association. The results of in vitro research suggest that high insulin concentrations can suppress Lp(a) levels by affecting apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] synthesis. This study aimed to identify the relationship between genetically predicted insulin concentrations and Lp(a) levels, which may partly explain the associations between low Lp(a) levels and increased risk of T2D.MethodsIndependent genetic variants strongly associated with fasting insulin levels were identified from meta-analyses of genome-wide association studies in European populations (GWASs) (N = 151,013). Summary level data for Lp(a) in the population of European ancestry were acquired from a GWAS in the UK Biobank (N = 361,194). The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method approach was applied to perform two-sample summary-level MR. Robust methods for sensitivity analysis were utilized, such as MR‒Egger, the weighted median (WME) method, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO), leave-one-out analysis, and MR Steiger.ResultsGenetically predicted fasting insulin levels were negatively associated with Lp(a) levels (β = − 0.15, SE = 0.05, P = 0.003). The sensitivity analysis revealed that WME (β = − 0.26, SE = 0.07, P = 0.0002), but not MR‒Egger (β = − 0.22, SE = 0.13, P = 0.11), supported a causal relationship between genetically predisposed insulin levels and Lp(a).ConclusionOur MR study provides robust evidence supporting the association between genetically predicted increased insulin concentrations and decreased concentrations of Lp(a). These findings suggest that hyperinsulinaemia, which typically accompanies T2D, can partially explain the inverse relationship between low Lp(a) concentrations and an increased risk of T2D.

The role of metabolic traits in ischemic stroke (IS) has been explored through observational studies and a few Mendelian randomization (MR) studies employing limited methods in European populations. This study aimed to investigate the causal effects of metabolic traits on IS in both East Asian and European populations utilizing multiple MR methods based on genetic insights. Two-sample and multivariable MR were performed, and MR estimates were calculated as inverse-variance weighted (IVW), weighted median, and penalized weighted median. Pleiotropy was assessed by MR-Egger and Mendelian randomization pleiotropy residual sum and outlier tests. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was associated with an increased risk of IS by IVW in both European (ORIVW: 1.032, 95% CI: 1.026-1.038, p < 0.001) and Japanese populations (ORIVW: 1.870, 95% CI: 1.122-3.116, p = 0.016), which was further confirmed by other methods. Unlike the European population, the evidence for the association of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) with IS in the Japanese population was not stable. No evidence supported an association between the other traits and IS (all Ps > 0.05) in both races. A positive association was found between SBP and IS in two races, while the results of DBP were only robust in Europeans.