Abstract
The broad aim of this research is to show the usefulness of sequential analytic methods when studying courtroom interaction within a communication accommodation theory (CAT) framework. Mutual influences between lawyers and witnesses during courtroom examinations were studied. A previous study examined associations between the content of lawyers' questions and witnesses' answers. In contrast, the present study examines turn taking and turn length, each in relation to the other and both in relation to the content of the interlocutor's previous turn. Using sequential log-linear techniques, this study analyzes 1850 question—answer exchanges from 47 examinations. Results show that lawyers were effective in constraining the quantitative aspects of witnesses' turns and, to a much lesser degree, the content aspects. These and other results are discussed in light of the literature on courtroom speech and of the advantages of using sequential methods when studying CAT strategies.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
