Abstract
Approximately 75% of the wheat and rye genomes consist of repeated sequence DNA. Three-quarters of the non-repeated or few copy sequences in wheat are less than 1000 base-pairs long, whilst in rye approximately half of the non-repeated or few copy sequences are in this size class. Most of the remaining non-repeated or few copy sequences appear to be a few thousand base-pairs long. In this paper a somewhat novel approach has been used to quantitatively analyse the linear organisation of the large proportion of repeated sequence DNA as well as the non-repeated DNA in the wheat and rye genomes. Repeated sequences in the genomes of oats, barley, wheat and rye have been used as probes to distinguish and isolate four different groups of repeated sequences and their neighbouring sequences from the wheat and rye genomes. Radioactively labelled wheat or rye DNA fragments ranging from 200 to over 9000 nucleotides long were incubated separately with large excesses of denatured unlabelled oats, barley, wheat and rye DNAs to C o t values which enable all the repeated sequences of the unlabelled DNA to renature. The following parameters were then determined from the proportions of total labelled DNA in fragments which had at least partially renatured. (1) The proportions of the repeated sequences in the labelled DNAs that were able to hybridise to each unlabelled DNA; (2) the mean distance apart of the hybridising sequences on the longer labelled fragments; and (3) the proportion of the genome in which the hybridising sequences were concentrated. Analysis of these results, together with those of separate experiments designed to quantitatively estimate the nature of sequences unable to reanneal with the repeated sequences of each of the probe DNAs, have enabled schematic maps to be drawn which show how the repeated and non-repeated sequences are arranged in the wheat and rye genomes. Both genomes are constructed from millions of relatively short sequences, most of them considerably shorter than 3000 base-pairs. This structure was recognised because adjacent sequences can be distinguished by their frequency of repetition (i.e. repeated or non-repeated) or by their evolutionary origin. Approximately 40 to 45% of the wheat genome and 30 to 35% of the rye genome consists of short non-repeated sequences interspersed between short repeated sequences. Approximately 50% of the wheat genome and 60% of the rye genome consists of tandemly arranged repeated sequences of different evolutionary origins. It is postulated that much of this complex repeated sequence DNA could have arisen from amplification of compound sequences, each containing repeated and non-repeated sequence DNA. Short repeated sequences with a number average length of around 200 base-pairs and which occupy about 20% of the wheat and rye genomes are related to repeated sequences also found in oats and barley. They are concentrated in 60 to 70% of the wheat and rye genomes, being interspersed with different short repeated sequences and a significant proportion of the short non-repeated sequences. Rye chromosomes contain more DNA than wheat chromosomes. This is principally, but not entirely, due to additional repeated sequence DNA. Many quantitative changes appear to have occurred in both genomes, possibly affecting most families of repeated sequences, since wheat and rye diverged from a common ancestor. Both species contain species-specific repeated sequences (24% of rye genome; 16% of wheat genome) but a large proportion of these are closely interspersed with repeated sequences found in both genomes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.