Abstract

Objective The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is widely used for depression screening in various patient populations. However, there are still insufficient data about its sensitivity and specificity in nonpsychiatric patients. Furthermore, some research suggests that somatic BDI items heighten its sum score artificially in physically ill patients. The aim of the present study was to validate the conventional BDI cut-off score by examination of its sensitivity and specificity in a mixed sample of cardiac inpatients and compare it to a modified “cognitive-emotional” BDI (BDI c/e) after exclusion of somatic items. Methods A total of 126 cardiologic inpatients were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) were calculated for total BDI (BDI t) and BDI c/e. Screening performance of cut-off scores was evaluated using the Youden Index ( Y). Results With the application of the conventional BDI cut-off score, ROC analysis revealed a moderate overall screening performance with Y=52.6 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83. In contrast, Y improved to 57.5 at a cut-off score of >9, but screening performance was still not optimal. BDI c/e showed also a moderate screening performance (AUC=.82); Y was maximized at a cut-off score of >8 ( Y=0.53.5). Again, no cut-off score provided optimal screening performance. Conclusion The BDI cannot be recommended as a formal screening instrument in cardiac inpatients since no cut-off score for either BDI t or BDI c/e combined both sufficiently high sensitivity and specificity. However, the shorter BDI c/e could be used as alternative to BDI t which may be confounded in physically ill patients. Generally, researchers should consider using alternative screening instruments (e.g., the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) instead.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.