Abstract

Driven piles are the basis of reliable deep foundations broadly used for various types of buildings and structures. Static load tests are conducted to ascertain correct results of static analyses, but static load tests are expensive and time-consuming procedures. Therefore, dynamic methods have become popular techniques for evaluation of the ultimate pile capacity. The results of dynamic methods strongly depend on hammer energy and soil conditions. Analyses of numerous case histories show good, bad and critical determination of pile capacity by dynamic methods. Verification of dynamic pile testing with a static load test does not always guarantee the pile’s ability to withstand design loads. It is not reasonable to connect pile testing at any construction site with determination of the ultimate pile capacity because the major goal of pile testing at sites is verification of the pile capability to withstand design loads. It is necessary to verify experimentally the pile capacity to withstand the design load with an appropriate factor of safety and check the applicability of signal-matching software for specified sites. Dynamic methods provide a sensible and beneficial approach to verification of the pile capacity necessary for withstanding design loads applied to piles.

Highlights

  • Pile foundations are broadly used in industrial, transportation and civil construction

  • This paper examines the published results of dynamic and static load tests, demonstrates the variability of results of dynamic methods depending on various factors and analyses how to apply rationally the results of dynamic methods for verification of the required pile capacity

  • It is necessary to note that a comparison of static and dynamic test results has certain scientific interest for verification of pile capacity determined by High-strain dynamic pile testing (HSDPT), but it does not provide answers regarding the capacity of a pile to be able to withstand design loads applied to piles at the specified site

Read more

Summary

Sensible determination of pile capacity by dynamic methods

Driven piles are the basis of reliable deep foundations broadly used for various types of buildings and structures. Dynamic methods have become popular techniques for evaluation of the ultimate pile capacity. Analyses of numerous case histories show good, bad and critical determination of pile capacity by dynamic methods. Verification of dynamic pile testing with a static load test does not always guarantee the pile’s ability to withstand design loads. It is not reasonable to connect pile testing at any construction site with determination of the ultimate pile capacity because the major goal of pile testing at sites is verification of the pile capability to withstand design loads. It is necessary to verify experimentally the pile capacity to withstand the design load with an appropriate factor of safety and check the applicability of signal-matching software for specified sites. Dynamic methods provide a sensible and beneficial approach to verification of the pile capacity necessary for withstanding design loads applied to piles

Introduction
Overview of the problem
Clay and sand HWT
Unknown criterion
Soil toe
Evaluation of static pile capacity determined by dynamic testing
FS case method
Days after dynamic testing
IPE cm pipe
FS TNOWave
FS plunging load
HSDPT testing
Days after
The energy effects on dynamic pile testing
Fall height Pile capacity
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.