Abstract

The paper is aimed at the analysis of the Middle Bronze Age materials from the Semiyarka IV burial ground in East Kazakhstan. In 2016–2018, two stone fences on the site were investigated by a joint expedition of the Altai and Pavlodar State Universities. The two fences contained human burials, inhumed in a wooden structure and in a composite stone cist box. The purpose of this work is to determine regional features and chronology of the Semiyarka IV funerary complex, as well as details of the ethnocultural development of the local population in the Middle Bronze Age. The research methodology includes analyses of the planigraphy and stratigraphy, compara-tive and typological study of the artifacts, anthropological investigation, examination of the pottery manufacturing technology, and radiocarbon dating. The technical and technological analysis of the pottery production was car-ried out using the method of A.A. Bobrinsky. Radiocarbon dates from wood and human bone samples were ob-tained by the liquid scintillation method in the archaeological technology laboratory of the Institute for the History of the Material Culture of the Russian Academy of Sciences. The dates were then calibrated using CALIB 8.2 program and IntCal 20 calibration curve. The body of collected data allows us to conclude that the Andronovo burial ground of Semiyarka IV is distinguished by its syncretism which is manifested in two different cultural com-ponents. The first component, ‘Central Kazakhstan’, is represented by the architectural traditions of building stone fences and graves cemented with a clay mortar, as well as by the presence of chamotte in the pottery containing additives traditional for the population of Central Kazakhstan. The second component, ‘Siberian’, is represented by the tradition of building wooden crypts, and in the ceramics complex, by some peculiar ornamental patterns typical of the eastern Ob River valley. The site is dated to the turn of the 18th/17th –16th c. BC. The architectural similarities of the Semiyarka IV burial ground structures with the Yenisei sites suggest that their origin is associ-ated with the Irtysh River region. The migration period of the mobile Andronovo communities to the northeast is dated to the 17th c. BC.

Highlights

  • OF SIBERIAN BRANCH OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCESEditor-in-Chief Bagashev A.N., Doctor of History, Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RAS. Editorial board members: Molodin V.I. (chairman), member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of History, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS.

  • Стратиграфические наблюдения показывают, что камни ограды были установлены на древнюю дневную поверхность

  • 3. Ограда 2: 1 — до начала работ; 2 — после расчистки; 3, 4 — погребальная камера; 5 — глиняная обмазка погребальной камеры; 6, 8 — план и профиль ограды 2 и могилы; 7 — вид погребения с востока.

Read more

Summary

OF SIBERIAN BRANCH OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES

Editor-in-Chief Bagashev A.N., Doctor of History, Tyumen Scientific Centre SB RAS. Editorial board members: Molodin V.I. (chairman), member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of History, Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography SB RAS. Стратиграфические наблюдения показывают, что камни ограды были установлены на древнюю дневную поверхность 3. Ограда 2: 1 — до начала работ; 2 — после расчистки; 3, 4 — погребальная камера; 5 — глиняная обмазка погребальной камеры; 6, 8 — план и профиль ограды 2 и могилы; 7 — вид погребения с востока. 5. Микроснимки естественных примесей (1‒3, 6‒10) и искусственных добавок (7‒11) в сырье и формовочных массах сосудов могильника Семиярка IV, примесей в эталонном образце сырья (3, 4), состав сырья обмазки погребальной камеры (12): 1 — породные обломки, покрытые неожелезненной глиной; 2 — включение неожелезненной глины; 3 — породный обломок, покрытый неожелезненной глиной; 4 — включение неожелезненной глины; 5 — обломок гематита; 6 — оолитовый бурый железняк (а) и включение породного обломка (б); 7 — включения раковин речных моллюсков и шамота; 8 — включение раковины (а), следы органического раствора (б); 9 — отпечаток растения (а), включение шамота (б); — включение шамота (а) с остатками раковины; — включение шамота (а), содержащего гранитно-гнейсовую дресву (б). Обжиг сосудов проводился в кострище или очаге в условиях смешанной окислительно-восстановительной среды с непродолжительным действием температур каления (650 С и выше), на что указывает ширина осветленных слоев, примыкающих к внешним стенкам сосудов, составляющая 0,5‒1,0 мм, а также коричневая с темно-серыми или серыми пятнами окрашенность внешних и внутренних поверхностей изделий

Результаты радиоуглеродного датирования
Findings
СПИСОК ЛИТЕРАТУРЫ
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.