Abstract
Abstract Habitat fragmentation is a principal threat to biodiversity and artificial river barriers are a leading cause of the global decline in freshwater biota. Although the impact of barriers on diadromous fish is well established, impacts on river‐resident fish communities remain unclear, especially for low‐head barriers. We examined the movement of five contrasting freshwater fish (topmouth gudgeon, European minnow, stone loach, bullhead and brown trout) in an experimental cascade mesocosm with seven pools separated by small vertical barriers. Passage rates differed significantly among species and increased with body size and sustained swimming speed (Usus), ranging from an average of 0.2 passes/hr in topmouth gudgeon to 3.4 passes/hr in brown trout. A random‐walk simulation indicated that barriers can result in net downstream movement and shifts in community composition. Passage rates in brown trout were leptokurtic, that is, most individuals were relatively sedentary while a small proportion showed frequent movements. Upstream passage rates of brown trout increased with body length and boldness while fish with lower aerobic scope tended to move downstream. Passage rates showed significant individual repeatability in brown trout, independent of body size, indicating the potential for in‐stream barriers to exert selective effects on fish populations. Our results show that barrier effects can be more complex than simply blocking fish passage, and that river‐resident fish can be impacted even by very small barriers. We show that fish passage depends on a wide range of morphological, physiological and behavioural drivers, and that barriers can exert selective effects on these traits and cause shifts in community composition. Policy implications. Barrier mitigation measures need to embrace interspecific and intraspecific variation in fish passage to avoid inadvertent artificial selection on fish communities. Given the high abundance of low‐head structures in river systems worldwide, a paradigm shift is needed to recognise the subtle impacts of small barriers on freshwater biodiversity. Removal of small barriers or nature‐like fishways should allow better passage of the wider fish community compared to widely used salmonid‐centric fish passage options.
Highlights
Induced loss of connectivity is a major cause of global biodiversity declines in terrestrial and aquatic systems (Fahrig, 2003; Reid et al, 2019)
We examined the movement of five contrasting freshwater fish in an experimental cascade mesocosm with seven pools separated by small vertical barriers
Our results show that barrier effects can be more complex than blocking fish passage, and that river-r esident fish can be impacted even by very small barriers
Summary
Induced loss of connectivity is a major cause of global biodiversity declines in terrestrial and aquatic systems (Fahrig, 2003; Reid et al, 2019). Barriers can impede fish migrations (McLaughlin et al, 2006), reduce population connectivity (Kelson et al, 2020) and cause habitat fragmentation (Junker et al, 2012), thereby threatening population persistence (Valenzuela-Aguayo et al, 2020). Fish passage research has focused on large diadromous fish such as salmon (Silva et al, 2018). This is perhaps due to a common misconception that species which complete their life cycles in freshwater are sedentary (Gerking, 1959), and largely unaffected by barriers. Most river-resident species are migratory to some extent, regularly undertaking longitudinal movements along river networks to complete their life cycles Consideration of the needs of river-resident fish is critical for delivering effective fish passage solutions
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
