Abstract
Purpose Living donor liver transplantation (LR) is an important alternative for children. We compared our outcomes of LR and cadaveric (CAD) graft recipients, with attention to the pediatric end-stage liver disease (PELD) score and perioperative morbidity and mortality to identify appropriate candidates for LR. Methods Our transplant database and electronic medical records were searched for demographics and outcome measures. Results From 2000 to 2008, 81 children underwent liver transplantation from 37 LR and 44 CAD donors. There were no significant differences in graft or overall survival at 3 months or 1 year. The LR group was significantly younger (4.46 ± 5.2 years vs 7.41 ± 6.6 years; P = .03) and had a significantly lower PELD score (12.7 ± 13 vs 22 ± 12; P = .001) at the time of transplantation. Ten patients were transplanted for unresectable tumor in the LR group vs 4 CAD ( P = .03). Significantly fewer LR recipients required return to the operating room in the first 30 days posttransplant (13.9% vs 34.1%; P = .03). The LR recipients had a higher rate of biliary stricture requiring reoperation (22.2% vs 2.3%; P = .005). Conclusions The LR liver transplantation is highly selected for patients with a parent donor who will need transplant but do not yet have a high PELD score. A lower PELD score at operation may have contributed to the lower incidence of postoperative complications requiring reoperation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
