Abstract
The use of pad-fan cooling (PFC) systems in greenhouses during summer is essential for improving crop production in tropical and subtropical regions. However, computational models have not been evaluated and compared for their ability to accurately simulate the temporal-spatial cooling generated by PFC systems. In addition, PFC systems generally have high electrical costs and provide uneven micro-climatic cooling, which is not conducive to crop growth. In the current study, four computational fluid dynamic (CFD) models (SST, Stke, Rngke, and Rke) combined with the Discrete Ordinate (DO) radiation model were compared for their ability to simulate the PFC cooling effects (wind speed, humidity, and temperature) in a greenhouse. After the best CFD model was identified, the significant factors (fan height or fan power density) which mostly affected the performance of the PFC system were determined. The results showed that, among the four CFD models, the SST model had the best simulation accuracy, i.e., it had both the smallest root mean squared error (RMSE) and the highest R2 when compared with measured indoor wind speeds and temperatures. And, fan power density significantly affected (p < 0.05) the cooling results of the PFC system in the greenhouse. After 15 min of cooling treatment, the indoor average relative humidity and temperature (65.42% and 27.46 °C) of mode b-B (with 1.25 W/m3 rated fan power density) and mode a-B (with rated 1.66 W/m3 fan power density) were significantly lower than those of modes c-B and d-B (with rated fan power densities < 1.25 W/m3) at 0.99 m fan height. We also found that mode b-B had the highest energy cooling efficiency of total active power (4.15 °C. m3J−1) among the four PFC modes. Therefore, mode b-B is recommended for the use of PFC systems in greenhouse cooling.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.