Seismic performance of fabricated concrete piers with grouted sleeve joints and bearing-capacity estimation method

Abstract

The seismic performance and design method of fabricated concrete bridge piers limit their applications in complex and harsh environments. In this study, a continuous bridge pier in an 8-degree seismic fortification intensity area was considered as a prototype. Two 1/3-scale models were designed and manufactured. The specimens were connected via a grouted sleeve connections (SFP) and a grouted sleeve prestressing tendon composite connections (SSFP), respectively. Moreover, a cast-in-place 1/3-scale model (reinforcement concrete pier, RCP) was designed as a comparison specimen. Quasi-static experiments were performed on these three specimens. The seismic performance of the specimens was analysed according to the failure phenomena, bearing capacity, displacement ductility, stiffness, energy-dissipation capacity, and residual deformation. On these basis, a bearing-capacity estimation method for SFP (including SSFP) was developed and validated. The results indicated that the damage to the SFP and SSFP mainly accumulated along the top and bottom of the sleeves. The plastic hinge area of the SFP and SSFP moved up or down. Thus, the damage to the SFP and SSFP was concentrated at the joints. Cracks first occurred at the seam of the two fabricated specimens when the loading drift was relatively small. Then, the concrete at the loading edge of the joints was crushed. Furthermore, the longitudinal bars yielded and broke. Finally, the specimens failed. Compared with the RCP, the SFP and the SSFP had larger yield and ultimate displacements. The bearing capacities of the RCP and the SFP were similar. However, the bearing capacity of the SSFP was significantly higher. The bearing capacities of the SFP and SSFP did not decrease significantly before the specimens failed. Compared with the RCP, the SFP had a lower initial stiffness, a lower stiffness degradation rate, similar displacement ductility, smaller residual displacement, and less cumulative energy dissipation. The SSFP was better than the SFP with regard to the displacement ductility, initial stiffness, and cumulative energy dissipation. Thus, the SFP and SSFP can satisfy the seismic requirements of high-intensity areas. The proposed bearing-capacity estimation method can be used for the seismic design and evaluation of SFPs and SSFPs.