Abstract
Abstract The security dilemma plays a central role in theories that explain international competition as a result of the pressures created by the international system. The challenge faced by these theories — which are termed structural realism — is to explain how rational states that are interested only in security can nevertheless end up in competition and war. Prominent structural‐realist theories emphasize the roles played by international anarchy — the lack of an international authority that can enforce agreements and protect states against the use of force — and the importance of power (Waltz, 1979). In the end, however, a satisfactory explanation of competition and war requires appreciation of the security dilemma. Including the security dilemma in structural international relations theories has dramatic implications, enabling them to explain variation in the competition fueled by the international system and raising the possibility of extensive international cooperation and sustained peace.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
