Abstract

Anomalous results from past neutrino experiments have been interpreted as potential evidence for an additional sterile neutrino with a mass on order of 1 eV, but this evidence remains inconclusive. The NOvA Near Detector is a 300 ton almost fully-active fine-grained liquid scintillator detector, that was designed for electron-neutrino identification. The detector is placed along the Fermilab NuMI beam line 1 km from the target and 14.6 mrad off-axis. At this off-axis angle the detector is exposed to a narrow band beam peaked at 2 GeV. Therefore the NOvA Near Detector will see neutrinos with a L/E range that is sensitive to oscillations between active neutrinos and light sterile neutrinos. In this report we discuss NOvA sensitivity from the joint electron-neutrino appearance and muon-neutrino disappearance analysis search for short-baseline sterile neutrino mixing.

Highlights

  • Introduction to Neutrino Physics1.1 The BeginningRadioactivity was first discovered by Henri Becquerel in Uranium in 1896 [1,2,3,4], and, two years later, by Madame Curie in Thorium [5]

  • The NOvA Near Detector is placed at a L/E centered at ∼ 0.5 km/GeV, consistent with the L/E range probed by Liquid Scintillator Neutrino Detector (LSND) and MiniBooNE, providing an opportunity to probe for the signature of active to sterile neutrino oscillations

  • I have shown the NOvA experiment’s potential to probe the anomalous results seen by the past short-baseline experiments by searching for the νe appearance and νμ disappearance at the NOvA Near Detector. If those anomalous results were due to the existence of fourth flavour neutrino with a mass larger than the standard 3-flavour neutrinos, the NOvA Near-Detector is expected to see the modifications in the NuMI flux due to active to sterile oscillations

Read more

Summary

Shows the effect of GENIE parameter CCQEPauliSupViaKF on both νe

6.3 This table shows the event rates expected for νe appearance channel at the LSND best fit point (sin22θ, ∆m2) = (0.003, 1.2 eV2) and the global best-fit (sin22θ, ∆m2) = (0.00048, 1.7 eV2) [87, 88] oscillation parameters. 125 xxiii xxiv 6.4 This table shows the event rates expected for νμ appearance channel at the LSND best fit point (sin22θ, ∆m2) = (0.003, 1.2 eV2) and the global best-fit (sin22θ, ∆m2) = (0.00048, 1.7 eV2) [87, 88] oscillation parameters. 126

The Beginning
How can a Neutrino Interact?
Neutrinos in Standard Model
Neutrino Mass
Three Generations of Neutrinos
Common Source of Neutrinos
Neutrinos Oscillations
Neutrino Oscillations in Vaccum
Neutrino Oscillations in Matter
Experimental Evidence for Neutrino Oscillations
Known Parameters
Unknown Parameters
Sterile Neutrinos
1.11 Experimental Evidence For Short-Baseline Oscillations
1.11.1 LSND and MiniBooNE Anomalies
1.11.2 MiniBooNE Anomaly
1.11.3 GALLIUM Anomaly
1.11.4 Reactor Anomaly
1.11.6 Searching of a Sterile neutrino with NOvA
Precise Measurement of θ23
Measurement of δCP
Resolving Mass Ordering
NOvA Neutrino Beam
Making 120 GeV Proton Main Injector Beam
Making a Neutrino Beam
NOvA Detectors
Two detector Principle
NOvA Detector Design
PVC Cell
Liquid Scintillator
Wavelength Shifting Fiber
Avalanche Photo Diode
Front-end Electronics Box
Data Concentrator Module
Data Acquisition System
Timing Synchronization
Display Visualizer
Overview of Monte Carlo Simulation
Neutrino Flux
Particle Propagation
Neutrino Interactions
Photon Transport
Electronic Simulation
Monte Carlo Simulation Tuning
Cherenkov Light
Calibration
Attenuation Calibration
Absolute Calibration
Clustering Algorithm
Line Finding Algorithm - Multi-Hough Transform
Vertex Identification
Cluster-Vertex Matching
Particle Identification - Convolutional Visual Networks
Energy Reconstruction
Muon Energy
Muon Neutrino Energy
Track Reconstruction
Systematics Methodology
Summary of Systematics
Flux Systematics
Cross-section Model Systematics
Neutral Currents
Calibration Systematics
Rock Systematics
Light Level And Cherenkov Systematics
Energy Bias
5.10 Normalization Systematics
5.10.2 Detector Mass
5.10.3 Detector Acceptance
5.11 Selection Efficiency of overlaid swapped νe
5.12.1 Periodic Calibration Triggers
5.12.2 Intensity Effect
SBL Oscillation Analysis Overview
New Tools Developed For SBL Analysis
CAF additions
Overlaid ND νe Appearance Sample
Datasets
Event Selection
Beam and Quality cuts
Selected events
Details of fitting framework
Log-Likelihood Fitting
Joint fit versus Single fit
Analysis Deliverables
Mock Data Sensitivity with no signal injection
Mock Data Sensitivity with LSND signal injection
Near Detector Data and MC Comparison
Blinding Study
Muon Removed Electron Events
Conclusion and Future
Systematic Samples
CAFAna Framework
NDOscCurve
NDOscillatableSpectrum
NDExtrap
NDPredictionExtrap
PredictionInterpJointAna
Findings
GENIE Systematic Table For νμ Selected Sample

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.