Abstract

Since its inception as a subdiscipline, the anthropology of education literature has been characterized by the volume and richness of descriptive ethnographies. Periodic review papers have commented on the lack of conceptual clarity in the key areas of cultural transmission and acquisition, but the theoretical challenges of such papers have been addressed infrequently. This paper attempts to clearly focus on the conceptual dilemmas that are inherent in the theories most widely adopted in the subdiscipline. By an analysis of the intrapsychic and interpsychic models of cultural transmission that underlie the influential work of Spindler and Gearing, it is shown that there is a mismatch between the culture theory of mainstream contemporary anthropology and the subdiscipline. The continuity of certain forms of instrumentalism in particular is shown to have unfortunate consequences for the anthropology of education insofar as the theoretical nexus between personal identity, culture, and institutionalized meanings is inadequately formulated. CULTURAL TRANSMISSION, ANTHROPOLOGY OF EDUCATION, CULTURE THEORY, EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, SOCIALIZATION.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.