Safety of incidental appendectomy

Abstract

Reports in the surgical literature are conflicting as to whether appendectomy “in passing” during laparotomy for trauma or for some other disease state does or does not significantly increase patient morbidity or mortality. A chart survey of all appendectomies (342 for acute appendicitis and 146 as incidental procedures) performed on the trauma service of Grady Memorial Hospital over a 40 month period appeared to indicate that the wound infection rate (6.8 percent) was the same as that for acute simple or suppurative appendicitis (6.7 percent), whereas the intraabdominal sepsis rate (17.5 percent) paralleled that for more advanced gangrenous or perforative appendicitis (18.6 percent). Since the validity of a retrospective review is always open to question, a prospective, randomized trial was carried out only on patients with a negative abdominal exploration for trauma over a 22 month interval at the same trauma service. An odd second from the last digit hospital number dictated appendectomy, provided the appendix was readily accessible; an even digit in the same locus dictated retention of the appendix. In no patient did intraperitoneal sepsis develop, regardless of the procedure chosen. Wound infection rates were 1.8 percent for appendectomy (1 of 56), if local anatomic considerations precluded an easy appendectomy (0 of 45), and 3.6 percent for the control subjects without appendectomy (3 of 83). There were no deaths. These data cast considerable doubt on the reliability of retrospective reviews and support the generally accepted dictum that incidental appendectomy, especially in the trauma patient, can be a relatively innocuous procedure.