Safety and Efficacy of Direct Thrombectomy Versus Bridging Therapy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Eligible for Intravenous Thrombolysis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Abstract

In the present study, we conducted a meta-analysis of reported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the safety and efficacy of direct thrombectomy (DT) and bridging therapy (BT) for patients eligible for intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science up to July 11, 2022 was performed. RCTs comparing DT and BT were included. The relative risk or rate difference and their 95% confidence intervals in a Mantel-Haenszel fixed effects model were used as the effect index of each outcome. The noninferior margin was specified as 80% for the relative risk or-10% for the rate difference. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with a favorable functional outcome, defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) score of 0-2 or a return to baseline at 90 days. Additional efficacy and safety outcomes included successful recanalization at the end of thrombectomy, excellent clinical outcomes (defined as an mRS score of 0-1), death within 90 ± 14 days, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, any type of intracerebral hemorrhage, and clot migration. Six RCTs with 2334 patients were pooled for the meta-analysis. The results showed the noninferiority of DT for favorable functional outcomes, higher successful recanalization rates, and any intracerebral hemorrhage in the BT group, with no statistically significant differences for other outcomes. The risk of bias for all RCTs in our analysis was low. DT achieved noninferiority to BT for favorable functional outcomes. Patient-level pooled analysis and subgroup analysis are needed to provide more information to distinguish which patients will benefit more from which therapy.