Safety and Efficacy of Conscious Sedation Versus General Anesthesia for Distal Vessel Thrombectomy

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anesthesia modality for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for distal and medium vessel occlusions remains an open question. General anesthesia (GA) may offer advantages over conscious sedation (CS) because of reduced patient movement facilitating catheter navigation, but concerns persist about potential delays and hypotension affecting collateral circulation. METHODS: In our prospectively maintained stroke registry from December 2014 to July 2023, we identified patients with distal and medium vessel occlusions defined as M2, M3, or M4 occlusion; A1 or A2 occlusion; and P1 or P2 occlusion, who underwent EVT for acute ischemic stroke. We compared patients who received CS with those who received GA. Primary outcomes were early neurological improvement (ENI), successful reperfusion, first-pass effect, and good outcome at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and 90-day mortality. RESULTS: Of 279 patients, 69 (24.7%) received GA, whereas 193 (69.2%) received CS. CS was associated with higher odds of ENI compared with GA (odds ratio [OR] 2.59, 95% CI [1.04-6.98], P < .05). CS was also associated with higher rates of successful reperfusion (OR 2.33, 95% CI [1.11-4.93], P < .05). CS nonsignificantly trended toward lower rates of mortality (OR 0.51, 95% CI [0.2-1.3], P = .16). No differences in good outcome at 90 days, intracerebral hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or first-pass effect were seen. CONCLUSION: The use of CS during EVT seems to be safe and feasible with regard to successful recanalization, hemorrhagic complications, clinical outcome, and mortality. In addition, it may be associated with a higher rate of ENI. Further randomized studies in this specific EVT subpopulation are warranted.