Abstract
The extant research literature concerning intrasaccadic stimuli implies that if a spot of light is flashed in the dark during a saccadic eye movement, one should subsequently look for the light in one direction while professing to see it lying in another. This paper accounts for this paradox in terms of two hypothesized varieties of sensed eye orientation, one estimating actual eye orientation (efference copy) and the other corresponding to intended eye orientation (afference copy).
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
