Rosy Cells with a Rocky Core: Low-Grade Oncocytic Tumor with Osseous Metaplasia

Renal cell tumors with eosinophilic/oncocytic cells include oncocytic papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe renal tumor, succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma, translocation-associated renal cell carcinoma, etc. Recently, several novel and evolving oncocytic renal tumors have been identified, such as eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, and low-grade oncocytic tumor. In addition, fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma occasionally presents with a low-grade oncocytic morphology. Although these entities demonstrate some overlapping morphological features with oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, they do have some unique morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular profiles. In this review, we present an update on selected oncocytic renal cell tumors (eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, low-grade oncocytic tumor, eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, low-grade fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma, and hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe renal tumor) and discuss their morphologies, immunohistochemical profiles, molecular genetic profiles, and biological behaviors.

Cytogenetic and molecular genetic techniques have been used in demonstrating the chromosomal abnormalities which characterize specific subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The aim of this study was to determine the efficiency of fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique in characterizing various subtypes of RCC based on the presence of specific chromosome abnormalities found in each RCC subtype. FISH was performed on touch imprint smears from eight renal cell carcinomas histologically confirmed by established criteria. In four tumors with histologic features of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC), interphase FISH was performed using centromeric probes for chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 12, 17 and 21. All four ChRCC tumors showed one FISH signal corresponding to one copy number for each of these chromosomes. Two papillary RCCs included in this study showed trisomy 7 and 17, and loss of chromosome Y, using the corresponding chromosome centromeric probes. Similarly, we tested two clear cell RCCs for chromosome 3 short arm deletion with DNA probe 3p21.3. Both tumors showed loss of 3p21.3 signal. We conclude that interphase FISH performed on touch imprint smears is a relatively simple, rapid and reliable method for detecting chromosome abnormalities which are specific for various subtypes of RCC.

BackgroundChRCC is a rare form of kidney cancer and presents with a poor prognosis in the metastatic setting, with limited response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapy. While previous studies suggested that ChRCC originates from intercalated cells of the kidney, its exact cellular origin has not been clearly defined. We therefore investigated the cellular origin of ChRCC and renal oncocytic neoplasms at single-cell resolution.MethodsChRCC, renal oncocytoma (RO) and low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) samples with matched normal kidney specimens were analyzed using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Epithelial cells from normal samples were clustered and annotated into the distinct known cellular types found in the adult healthy human kidney. A logistic regression model (Young M.D. et al., Science, 2018) was trained on the normal epithelial clusters, using a comprehensive set of 74 marker genes (features). Subsequently, the model was tested on tumor clusters from ChRCC, RO and LOT to investigate their cellular origin through the identification of the highest predicted probabilities of similarity between normal epithelial cellular types and tumor cells. Differential gene expression and pathway analyses between ChRCC and its cell of origin were then conducted to investigate mechanisms of oncogenesis.ResultsFollowing quality-control, 46,817 cells from 5 tumors (ChRCC: n=3, RO: n=1 and LOT: n=1) and 4 normal samples were isolated for scRNA-seq analysis. Among normal samples, 784 epithelial cells were clustered and annotated into the following cellular entities: proximal tubule (PT), loop of Henle – distal tubule (LOH-DT), principal cells (PC), α-intercalated cells (ICA) and β-intercalated cells (ICB). Across all ChRCC and oncocytic tumors, 7,573 tumor cells were identified, among which 7,425 corresponded to ChRCC. For ChRCC, RO, and LOT neoplasms, the highest predicted probability of similarity was consistently identified with ICA cells (ranging from 0.60 to 0.80). This finding was validated using an external and previously published (Zhang Y. et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2021) scRNA-seq dataset from a patient with ChRCC (n=2,853 cells). Additionally, evaluation of previously defined ChRCC-specific markers (i.e. FOXI1, RHCG, KIT, CLCNKA, and CLCNKB) in scRNA-seq data of normal kidney epithelial cells consistently showed the highest expression in ICA cells. Differential gene expression between ChRCC and ICA cells revealed a significant downregulation of MHC class I genes (i.e. HLA-A , HLA-B, and HLA-C) and HSP70 (family A) genes (i.e. HSPA1A, HSPA1B, HSPA6, and HSPA8) in ChRCC. Differential pathway analysis between ChRCC and ICA cells showed a significant enrichment of the ferroptosis, glutathione metabolism, mTOR signaling and IL-15 pathways in ChRCC.ConclusionsRenal oncocytic tumors, including ChRCC, appear to originate from the α-intercalated cells of the normal human kidney. As compared to α-intercalated cells, ChRCC downregulates MHC class I genes, which may be associated with its poor response to immunotherapy. Further, the selective downregulation of HSP70 genes may in part explain ChRCC’s increased sensitivity to ferroptosis.CDMRP DOD Funding: yes

The aim of this study was to assess the histopathologic spectrum of renal tumors in patients with PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS), with a specific focus on potential features predictive of the underlying syndrome. A multi-institutional study was conducted to obtain clinical and pathologic data on renal tumors arising in patients with PHTS, either diagnosed by germline mutational analysis or clinical criteria for Cowden syndrome. Histologic sections of the renal tumors were re-reviewed for classification. Twelve renal epithelial tumors from 9 patients were identified (4 males and 5 females, with a mean age of 41.8y), 7 of whom carried germline PTEN mutations. All 12 renal epithelial tumors were renal cell carcinomas (RCCs): 5 were chromophobe RCCs, 4 papillary RCCs, and 3 RCC not otherwise specified. Pathologic stage distribution was: 7 (59%) pT1a, 2 (17%) pT1b, 1 (8%) pT2a, 1 (8%) pT2b, and 1 (8%) pT3a. World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) histologic grade was applicable in 7 (54%) nonchromophobe tumors: 4 (57%) G2, 2 (29%) G3, and 1 (14%) G4. An unexpected histologic finding was the presence of 2 patients with incidental microscopic collections of intrarenal adipocytes that had no features of angiomyolipoma (and were negative with 2 sensitive PEComa markers: cathepsin-K and GPNMB); both were classified as lipoma/"lipomatous hamartomas." The average follow-up interval was 67.8 months (13 to 172mo): 5 patients had no evidence of disease, 2 were lost to follow-up, 1 died of other (non-PHTS) causes (ie, prostate cancer), and 1 was alive with metastatic RCC to the lung (RCC not otherwise specified with rhabdoid differentiation). All tumors showed loss of nuclear PTEN staining by immunohistochemistry. Fumarate hydratase was retained and 2SC was negative in all papillary RCCs. CK7 was moderate-strong/diffuse positive in 4 of 5 chromophobe RCCs and in 3 of 4 papillary RCCs. Renal epithelial tumors associated with PHTS represent a heterogeneous group of RCCs, but classic chromophobe and papillary RCC are most common. The majority have a favorable clinical behavior as would be predicted by subtype. In contrast to other hereditary renal neoplasia syndromes, morphologic features of the RCCs do not allow identification of PHTS-associated neoplasia with any degree of specificity in the absence of clinical setting and/or prior history, but the presence of microscopic "lipomas" within the kidney may provide a clue in rare cases. Therefore, clinical suspicion and genetic counseling with germline testing remain necessary for identifying PHTS-associated RCC.

4549 Background: ChRCC represents about 5% of all kidney cancer and has a dismal prognosis in the metastatic setting, with limited response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and targeted therapy. We evaluated the molecular properties of ChRCC and related oncocytic neoplasms to define the tumor immune microenvironment and identify potential therapeutic strategies. Methods: ChRCC, renal oncocytoma (RO) and low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) samples with matched normal kidney specimens were evaluated using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-cell T-cell receptor sequencing (scTCR-seq). T-cell antigenic specificities from scTCR-seq were inferred using a comprehensive database of annotated T-cell receptor sequences (VDJdb). The infiltration of CD45+ immune cells in renal oncocytic tumors and ccRCC samples was quantified using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data of clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and ChRCC were further analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) KIRC and KICH cohorts, respectively, with immune cell fractions calculated using CIBERSORTx. Results: After quality-control, 46,817 cells from 5 tumor (ChRCC: n = 3, RO: n = 1 and LOT: n = 1) and 4 normal samples were isolated for scRNA-seq analysis. Renal oncocytic tumors (ChRCC, RO, and LOT) had a low density of CD45+ cells (mean: 739 ± 114 cells/mm2; n = 5) compared to ccRCC (mean: 3,420 ± 1,979 cells/mm2; n = 5) (p < 0.05). Across all tumors, CD8+ T-cell clusters displayed a low expression of immune exhaustion markers (i.e. PDCD1 [PD-1], CTLA4, LAG3, HAVCR2 [TIM-3], and TIGIT). Analysis of TCGA bulk RNA-seq data after adjustment for CD8 T-cell fraction showed no difference in the expression of most immune exhaustion markers (i.e. PDCD1, CTLA4, LAG3) in ChRCC compared to normal samples (p > 0.05), contrasting with a substantially higher expression in ccRCC versus normal kidney (p < 0.05). Analysis of the T-cell repertoire (scTCR-seq) of ChRCC, RO and LOT samples did not identify a pattern of clonal expansion, and a considerable proportion of clonotypes were inferred to have specificity for viral antigens (range: 1.3 to 34.4% among all samples; 11.3 to 34.4% after filtering out two samples with a low ( < 300) number of T-cells). Conclusions: Renal oncocytic tumors, including ChRCC, exhibit a low infiltration of immune cells, a non-exhausted immune phenotype and, a lack of clonally expanded tumor-specific T-cells. These findings may partially explain the molecular basis for the lack of response to ICIs in advanced ChRCC and outline the unique exhaustion phenotype of renal oncocytic tumors.

Background: Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) represents 5% of all kidney cancers. In contrast to clear cell RCC (ccRCC), the immune landscape of ChRCC and its response to immunotherapy remain poorly characterized. We sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients with ChRCC treated with immuno-oncology (IO)-based regimens, and assess the immune cell composition, phenotypic state, and T cell specificity in the tumor microenvironment of ChRCC. Methods: Using real-world data from the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium, we analyzed the survival outcomes and objective responses of patients with advanced ChRCC to currently adopted IO-based regimens (i.e. dual IO therapy or IO + vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy [VEGF-TT]) in the first-line setting, as compared to patients with ccRCC. Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) and single-cell T-cell receptor sequencing (scTCR-seq) were performed on ChRCC and related oncocytic neoplasms (i.e. renal oncocytoma [RO] and low-grade oncocytic tumor [LOT]) samples with matched normal kidney specimens. The infiltration of CD45+ immune cells in renal oncocytic tumors and ccRCC samples was quantified using immunohistochemistry (IHC). Results: Compared to patients with ccRCC (n=856) treated with first-line IO-based regimens, patients with ChRCC (n=31) had a lower overall survival (median: 24.7 vs. 50.5 months, p<0.001) and lower time to treatment failure (median: 4.5 vs. 11.0 months, p<0.001). Similarly, patients with ChRCC had a significantly lower overall response rate than those with ccRCC (12.0 vs. 47.1%, respectively; p<0.001). When evaluating immune cell infiltration, renal oncocytic tumors (ChRCC, RO, and LOT) exhibited a low density of CD45+ cells (mean: 739 ± 114 cells/mm2; n=5) compared to ccRCC (mean: 3,420 ± 1,979 cells/mm2; n=5) (p<0.05). Single-cell analysis was performed on 46,817 cells from 5 tumors (ChRCC: n=3, RO: n=1 and LOT: n=1) and 4 samples from adjacent normal kidney. Across all tumors, CD8+ T cell clusters displayed a lower expression of immune checkpoints (i.e. PDCD1, CTLA4, LAG3, HAVCR2, and TIGIT) as compared to CD8+ T-cells from ccRCC. This was further validated in the analysis of bulk RNA-seq data from the TCGA, with a significantly lower expression of all immune checkpoints in ChRCC compared to both ccRCC (p<0.01) and papillary RCC (pRCC; p<0.01). Analysis of the T cell receptor repertoire (scTCR-seq) of ChRCC, RO and LOT samples did not show any pattern of clonal expansion, and a higher proportion of T cells in ChRCC were inferred to have a viral specificity, compared to ccRCC (0.79 vs. 0.1%, respectively). Conclusions: Patients with metastatic ChRCC appear to display poor clinical outcomes when treated with IO-based regimens, compared to ccRCC. Renal oncocytic tumors, including ChRCC, exhibit a low infiltration of immune cells, and a non-exhausted immune phenotype. Citation Format: Michel Alchoueiry, Chris Labaki, Long Zhang, Yue Hou, Kevin Bi, Charbel Hobeika, J. Connor Wells, Kosuke Takemura, Ziad Bakouny, Sabrina Camp, Carmen Priolo, Damir Khabibullin, Nicholas Schindler, Renee Maria Saliby, Eddy Saad, Samer Salem, Melissa Daou, Rana McKay, Sumanta Pal, Daniel Heng, Eliezer Van Allen, Sachet Shukla, Toni Choueiri, David Braun, Elizabeth Henske. Clinical and molecular characterization of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: A focus on immunotherapy based regimens and the tumor immune microenvironment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Advances in Kidney Cancer Research; 2023 Jun 24-27; Austin, Texas. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(16 Suppl):Abstract nr B019.

C- kit expression in renal oncocytomas and chromophobe renal cell carcinomas

The clinical staging of renal cortical tumors traditionally has not evaluated the potential effect of histological subtypes on survival. Evidence suggests that conventional clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and nonconventional clear cell RCC (chromophobe and papillary) have different metastatic potential. Using a large renal tumor database, we examined the effect of tumor histology on the pattern of metastasis and patient survival. All patients with nonmetastatic renal cortical tumors undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy were identified from a renal tumor database between July 1989 and July 2002. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression tests were used for statistical analysis. Analysis revealed 1057 patients: 794 with conventional clear cell RCC, 157 with papillary RCC, and 106 with chromophobe RCC. Metastasis occurred in 95 conventional clear cell RCC, 9 papillary RCC, and 6 chromophobe RCC with a median follow-up of 34.6, 43.0, and 33.2 months, respectively. Using log-rank analysis, chromophobe and papillary RCC were associated with an improved disease-free survival at 5 years (P =.009 and.015, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed tumor size, stage, and chromophobe histology as significant variables for disease progression. Renal cortical tumors have distinct histological subtypes with varying degrees of metastatic potential. Conventional clear cell RCC, which comprises two thirds of renal cortical tumors presenting with localized disease, has a less favorable outcome when compared with papillary and chromophobe RCC. Controlling for size and stage, chromophobe, and not papillary, RCC was a significant variable for disease progression compared with conventional clear cell RCC. Knowledge of renal cortical tumor histological subtype is critical for projecting prognosis, tailoring follow-up strategies, and designing clinical trials.

To retrospectively evaluate the ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to differentiate renal tumours. MR images from 100 consecutive pathologically proven solid renal tumours without macroscopic fat [57 clear cell, 16 papillary and 7 chromophobe renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 16 oncocytomas and 4 minimal fat angiomyolipomas (AMLs)] between 2009 and 2012 were evaluated. Two radiologists blinded to pathology results independently reviewed double-echo chemical shift, dynamic contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. Signal intensity index (SII), tumour-to-spleen SI ratio (TSR), ADC ratio, wash-in (WiI) and wash-out indices (WoI) between different phases were calculated. There were significant differences between papillary RCCs and other renal tumours for arterial WiI (P < 0.001), initial WoI (P = 0.006) and ADC ratio (P < 0.001); between chromophobe RCCs and oncocytomas for TSR (P = 0.02), parenchymal WiI (P = 0.03), late WiI (P = 0.02), initial WoI (P = 0.03) and late WoI (P = 0.04); and between clear cell RCCs and oncocytomas for SII (P = 0.01) and parenchymal WiI (P = 0.01). Papillary RCCs were distinguished from other tumours (sensitivity 37.5 %, specificity 100 %) and oncocytomas from chromophobe RCCs (sensitivity 25 %, specificity 100 %) and clear cell RCCs (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 94.2 %). MR imaging provides criteria able to accurately distinguish papillary RCCs from other tumours and oncocytomas from chromophobe and clear cell RCCs. • Multiparametric MR parameters accurately distinguish papillary RCCs with high specificity (100 %). • Oncocytomas can be distinguished from chromophobe RCCs with high specificity (100 %). • Oncocytomas can be distinguished from clear cell RCCs with high specificity (94.2 %). • In oncocytomatosis, imaging follow-up with such parameters analysis could be promoted.

Multiple therapeutic options for renal tumors that are now available have put pathologists under increasing pressure to render diagnosis on limited material. Results on biopsies by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) have historically not been encouraging. Currently, multiple immunohistochemical markers with differential expression in these renal tumors are available. We studied the utility of such markers on needle biopsies that were obtained ex vivo. After nephrectomy, two 18-guage cores were obtained and processed routinely. Expressions of carbonic anhydrase (CA) IX, CD117, α-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR), cytokeratin 7 (CK7), and CD10 were evaluated. Results, with or without immunostaining, were compared with the final nephrectomy diagnosis. We studied 145 tumors, including 119 renal cell carcinomas (83 clear cell, 18 papillary, 14 chromophobe, and 4 type unclassified), 11 oncocytomas, and 15 miscellaneous tumors. Adequate evaluable material was present in 123 (85%) cases. In such biopsies, 81% of cases were correctly classified by H&E alone, with correct diagnosis in 90% of cases in the most common tumor subtypes (clear cell, papillary and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and oncocytoma). By adding immunostains, the accuracy was 90% overall and 99% among the 4 most common subtypes. The following extent and patterns of immuneexpression were highly useful in the diagnoses: diffuse, membranous CAIX expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, diffuse positivity for AMACR in papillary renal cell carcinoma, distinct peripheral cytoplasmic accentuation for CD117 in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, widespread and intense positivity for CK7 in chromophobe and papillary renal cell carcinoma, and diffuse membranous reactivity in clear cell and patchy/luminal in papillary renal cell carcinoma for CD10. In conclusion, utilizing immunostains improves classification of renal tumors on needle biopsy, which may be of particular help for pathologists with limited experience. Both extent and patterns must be considered for a definitive diagnosis.

To investigate whether iodine content can discriminate between benign or malignant renal tumors, malign tumor subtypes, low-grade and high-grade tumors on rapid kv-switching dual-energy CT (rsDECT). This prospective study enrolled 95 patients with renal tumors who underwent rsDECT for tumor characterization between 2016 and 2018. Attenuation on true and virtual unenhanced images, absolute enhancement and enhancement ratio and iodine content of each lesion on nephrographic phase iodine density images were measured. Histopathological diagnosis was obtained following either surgery or core biopsy. Eighty-five tumors were renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (56 clear cell, 20 papillary, 9 chromophobe) and 10 were benign (6 angiomyolipoma,4 oncocytoma). 46 tumors were low-grade and 23 high-grade. There was significant difference between iodine content of clear cell and non-clear cell (papillary + chromophobe) RCC (p < 0.001). However, no significant iodine content differences were found between papillary and chromophobe RCC, benign and malignant tumors, low-grade and high-grade tumors. The best cut-off iodine content for differentiating clear cell from non-clear cell RCC was 3.2mg/ml and clear cell from papillary RCC was 2.9mg/ml with a high sensitivity and specificity. Also, significant difference was found between attenuation values of true and virtual unenhanced images (p = 0.007). Mean iodine content, absolute enhancement and enhancement ratio were highly correlated. rsDECT contributes to renal tumor characterization by showing higher iodine content in clear cell RCCs compared with non-clear cell RCCs.

A Genomic Algorithm for the Molecular Classification of Common Renal Cortical Neoplasms: Development and Validation

Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

NKX6-1 is a transcription factor that plays a key role in the development, differentiation, and identity maintenance of beta cells of pancreatic islets. Although NKX6-1 expression has also been discovered in pancreatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (WDNETs) and duodenal WDNETs, its expression in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is unexplored. Analysis of mRNA expression and immunohistochemistry of NKX6-1 was performed using the kidney cancer cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and paraffin-embedded whole-tissue slides from our 196 collected cases, including 48 chRCCs (43 classic and 5 eosinophilic subtypes), 24 renal oncocytomas (ROs), 46 clear cell renal cell carcinomas, 41 papillary renal cell carcinomas, 14 renal urothelial carcinomas, 7 low-grade oncocytic renal tumors (LOTs), 8 eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinomas, 3 succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinomas, and 5 renal oncocytic tumors, not otherwise specified. NKX6-1 expression was almost exclusively upregulated in chRCC at both the mRNA and protein levels compared with other renal tumors. NKX6-1 was immunohistochemically positive in 39 of 48 (81.3%) chRCCs, but negative in 46 clear cell renal cell carcinomas, 24 ROs, 7 low-grade oncocytic renal tumors, 8 eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinomas, 3 succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinomas, and 5 renal oncocytic tumors, not otherwise specified. Diffuse, moderate, and focal NKX6-1 staining were seen in 21, 4, and 14 of the 39 chRCCs, respectively. In contrast, NKX6-1 was focally positive in only 1 of 41 (2.4%) papillary renal cell carcinomas and 2 of 14 (14.3%) renal urothelial carcinomas. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of NKX6-1 staining were 81.3% and 98% for chRCC, respectively. In conclusion, NKX6-1 may be a novel potential marker for differentiating chRCC from other renal neoplasms, especially from RO.

4558 Background: ChRCC is an uncommon kidney cancer variant that has a poor prognosis in the metastatic setting, with limited response to current standard-of-care immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used for other RCC histologies. We evaluated the tumor-immune microenvironment of ChRCC and other related oncocytic neoplasms to better understand the immunophenotype of these tumors. Methods: We performed paired single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), single-cell T-cell receptor sequencing (scTCR-seq), and CD45 immunohistochemistry (IHC) of ChRCC, renal oncocytoma (RO) and low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT) tumor and matched normal samples. Bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) data of clear cell RCC (ccRCC), papillary RCC (pRCC) and ChRCC were additionally analyzed using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) kidney cancer cohorts. T cell antigenic specificities from scTCR-seq were inferred using a comprehensive database of annotated T-cell receptor sequences (VDJdb). Single-cell transcriptomic signatures were used to infer the tumor specificity (Oliveira G, Nature, 2021 and Lowery FJ, Science, 2022) and viral specificity (Oliveira G, Nature, 2021) of CD8+ T-cells from ChRCC, as compared to those from ccRCC (Braun DA, Cancer Cell, 2021). Results: ChRCC and other oncocytic tumors had a lower infiltration of CD45+ immune cells as compared to ccRCC (p&lt;0.01). Single-cell analysis was performed on 46,817 cells from 5 tumors (ChRCC: n=3, RO: n=1 and LOT: n=1) and 4 normal samples. Across all tumors, CD8+ T cell clusters displayed a lower expression of immune checkpoints (i.e. PDCD1 [PD-1], CTLA4, LAG3, HAVCR2 [TIM-3], and TIGIT) as compared to ccRCC. This was further validated in a bulk RNA-seq analysis using TCGA data, with a significantly lower expression of all immune checkpoints in ChRCC compared to both ccRCC (p&lt;0.01) and papillary RCC (pRCC; p&lt;0.01). Analysis of the T cell receptor repertoire (scTCR-seq) of ChRCC, RO and LOT samples did not show any pattern of clonal expansion, and a higher proportion of T cells in ChRCC were inferred to have a viral specificity, as compared to ccRCC (0.79 vs. 0.1%, respectively). CD8+ T cells from ChRCC (vs. ccRCC) displayed a significantly lower expression of two signatures of tumor specificity (p&lt;0.01), and a higher expression of the viral-specific signature (p&lt;0.01). Conclusions: In ChRCC, there is low infiltration by CD45+ immune cells. Although infiltrating CD8+ T cells have a predominantly non-exhausted immune phenotype, they likely lack anti-tumor specificity (i.e. are “bystander” T cells). These findings may help to understand the molecular basis for the lack of response to immunotherapy recently identified among patients with advanced ChRCC, and support future therapeutic strategies to increase infiltration of tumor-specific T cells into the tumor microenvironment.